Last Visible Canary
actively parsing hurf durf
- Joined
- Nov 28, 2006
- Messages
- 4,577
I had always thought that shill bidding was posting higher bids without the intention of winning the item, only meant to hike up the price. But I had always assumed that if the shill bidders price ended up being the high bid, he had to purchase the item or become a non paying bidder wich ebay would take action against if they could.
I just sold something on ebay, and the last bidder put in a high bid that was above the last bidders price, and then retracted it. If the winning bid was set before the retracted high bid was placed, it should have been 576$ (1$ above the last highest unretracted bid), but instead was 585$.
So, after having been told by another ebay member that I apprently need to hire better shill bidders who "cover their tracks" - Is it actually ebays policy to raise the highest bidders price to their highest bid after a bid retraction like that rather then returning the bid to its original number as though the retraction had never taken place (in this case 576$)?
If so - thats retarded.
an example - If an item is selling for 25$ to bidder A, and Bidder C bids 250$. Their highest bid becomes 26$ to Bidder C.
Now comes the "shill bidder" who puts in a bid of 2,000$, and then instantly retracts it. Will Bidder C's bid become 250$ even though the shill bidders bid was retracted?
again - if thats the case thats rediculous.....
I just sold something on ebay, and the last bidder put in a high bid that was above the last bidders price, and then retracted it. If the winning bid was set before the retracted high bid was placed, it should have been 576$ (1$ above the last highest unretracted bid), but instead was 585$.
So, after having been told by another ebay member that I apprently need to hire better shill bidders who "cover their tracks" - Is it actually ebays policy to raise the highest bidders price to their highest bid after a bid retraction like that rather then returning the bid to its original number as though the retraction had never taken place (in this case 576$)?
If so - thats retarded.
an example - If an item is selling for 25$ to bidder A, and Bidder C bids 250$. Their highest bid becomes 26$ to Bidder C.
Now comes the "shill bidder" who puts in a bid of 2,000$, and then instantly retracts it. Will Bidder C's bid become 250$ even though the shill bidders bid was retracted?
again - if thats the case thats rediculous.....