Terry Newton said:
260,
As I have stated before, I do not believe this to be abuse in the least bit. Even if one does not hold the knife straight up and down. It is being hit with a piece of wood while resting on a piece of wood. No wood has the rockwell of a Rat, or other quality knife.
Watch out 360, you've been demoted.
I think you're quite right as to it not being abusive.
As chipping or indenting of the spine isn't the concern, the hardness of the baton really doesn't matter--I could bolt the handle of a Steel Heart to the edge of a wooden table and hit the protruding blade with a 15 pound sledge (rockwell about 40-45) and it'd snap it in a heartbeat. In fact, since mis-aligned batoning is a lateral stress, the harder the blade the more prone to breaking it will be.
That said, a wooden baton that you'll be using in the field (or even *shudder* a typical hammer) is a far cry from a 15 lb. sledge, and I don't think the type of work described would be a challenge for the Rats, unless you're batoning through massive amounts of ironwood and your technique is just
beyond horrible. I'd think the differential tempering of the larger Rats would be more ideal, versus the thru-hardened smaller ones, but I think that's largely an academic difference in this case. Kind of like saying that, in their primes, Ali could beat me to a pulp better than Foreman could. It might be true, but either way it wouldn't be much of a fight.
Where that knife failed was its sharp, unradiused tang. Swamp Rat tangs, hidden and exposed, are all about curves. Setting aside any differences in the steel and heat-treat (which would be enough all on their own), design alone sets the Rats up to better cope with this type of work.