Question on Case Damascus Humpback Half Whittler

Peregrin

Traditional Forum Moderator
Moderator
Gold Member
Joined
Sep 2, 2004
Messages
18,502
I'm looking at buying the new Case Damascus Humpback Half Whittler. I'm trying to find out if the blades share a single backspring or not. Does anyone have experience with this pattern? Any help is appreciated.
 
10816.jpg


I'm pretty sure it's one spring. That's a primary selling point for most or all 'half' whittler/congress patterns, as it makes the knife much slimmer in the pocket. In the pic above (borrowed from a vendor site), it does look like a single spring.
 
I suppose it is possible that it is a single spring, but the Humpback Whittler is a three spring, so I would guess the half whittler is a two spring. I haven't seen one, though.
 
I saw that pic David and it looks like a single spring to me too. I was hoping to get that confirmed as that is what makes the knife attractive to me. Jack the three spring Humpback is what made me wonder too.
 
A 3 spring knife is not a Whittler regardless of what the marketing team wants to call it. The above "Half Whitler" should properly be called a Swell Center Congress with a Clip blade, but that's rather cumbersome.
roland
 
2 springs it is. That's an eye-opener for me.

Looks like Case has opted for greater strength/durability (wonder how strong/stiff the springs are?), over the slim/light appeal that I'd otherwise assumed was a big draw to this pattern. Shouldn't have to worry about crinked blades (or blade rub) anymore, either. Interesting.
 
2 springs it is. That's an eye-opener for me.

Looks like Case has opted for greater strength/durability (wonder how strong/stiff the springs are?), over the slim/light appeal that I'd otherwise assumed was a big draw to this pattern. Shouldn't have to worry about crinked blades (or blade rub) anymore, either. Interesting.

The tradeoff is that when they go to the spring-per-blade design, the springs and blades are all somewhat thinner than a single spring design would be -- so, no, they don't get any greater strength or durability - it's purely an expedient, simple to assemble design requiring much less skilled labor to do properly. This is also true for their older 3 blade/2 spring designs with crinked blades that are converted to three springs - the originals had thicker blades and springs.
 
The tradeoff is that when they go to the spring-per-blade design, the springs and blades are all somewhat thinner than a single spring design would be -- so, no, they don't get any greater strength or durability - it's purely an expedient, simple to assemble design requiring much less skilled labor to do properly. This is also true for their older 3 blade/2 spring designs with crinked blades that are converted to three springs - the originals had thicker blades and springs.

Thanks Dwight.

I have a 10347 Case stockman with the 3-spring config. I did notice those blades are thinner than what's found a comparably-sized 2-spring stockman.
 
Thanks for the info and discussion guys. I guess this one gets scratched off the my wish list. I would have jumped on it if it were a single spring.
 
This pattern iteration looks great to me, though I would prefer it was a clip/sheepsfoot combo.

I have only two Case knives, but as a reference, one is the (two spring) SS "Rough Black" Humpback Stockman and it has jumped ahead of all my other, more expensive carbon blades as a daily carry pocket knife. The pattern shape is most pleasurable to hold. Pull is 6.5 and it has a clean, solid snap. However many people made it, it is a pleasure to carry and use.

I like the Case Humpback pattern so much that it starts to bum me out that they do not pin their shields. I'd prefer no shield to glued. Still, I plan on purchasing a second example of this pattern with a different handle material just for kicks. OP, you should give it a shot if the chance won't put you out too much. :thumbup:
 
Back
Top