How do they compare to a hatchet, like the 19" Wetterlings and GB? Obviously birds of different feathers, but still would be interesting to see.
that's a pretty big question, so i am just going to bomb ya with some thoughts, brother, that might help.
..........
Trail Hawks heads
alone weigh about
14 to 15 ounces,
stock.
a proper tomahawk weighs about
an ounce per inch of length, while a hatchet weighs more like an
ounce to an ounce and a half per inch of length, to be
optimized IMHO.
- so a
24 inch hawk with proper physics should weigh about
24 ounces, give or take ten percent;
...going lighter per inch will make the hawk
more suited for combatives, while going heavier will make the hawk act more
(in degrees) like a hatchet, then a Forest Axe, then a Poll Axe or Battle Axe, and so on, regulated by
mass distribution of the total system.
since most handles are
homogenous, you usually have unremarkable changes as you change lengths;
Gen 1 endo-/exo-skeletal composite handles have
two linear cavities, which allows us to milk the physics of the hawks letting them bite deeper, move faster, with little to no weight penalty and affording increased strength.
Hatchets tend to be better at nibbling though
hardwoods compared to hawks,
when used directly on the wood, but only show a real advantage in field chores over proper hawks when you are doing something big,
again; directly with the tool to the wood;
an example of using a hawk to split wood would be to make smaller wood pegs
(less than 2 inches in diameter) or wedges, and driving the wood through the wood that you wish to split. - the
Indirect Approach at a good solution. - this can be a good practice in extreme cold, whether using a hawk or a hatchet, or something entirely different though.
hatchets like the GBs and Wetterlings are my favorites of their type because they have
knife-like bits, similar to hawks, and can be used for some advanced field chores,
just like the hawks i favor.
example.
[youtube]6pJFpn-GkPI[/youtube]
as folks get more interested in super tools, they are losing the Old Ways, and not being as
technical when they can just bust through whatever they want.
maybe that's okay. - i just am
carrying my tools most of the time, so hawks are about the
lightest things i can carry that still
get 'er done.
since
good hatchet heads can be
almost twice as heavy as a
true hawk head, such as the Cold Steel Trail Hawk, the hawks can be much lighter, and more agile in a fight, if it comes to that.
don't get me wrong, i know
hawks aren't for everyone - no need for a car camper to have a proper hawk when he can have a splitting maul IMHO;

:thumbup:
i like Forest Axes a lot too, and i love big axes, but a
proper long hawk is what i prefer because it weighs almost nothing
when it has proper physics, has a huge return on what i can do with it,
directly or indirectly, and takes
much less energy to tote around on long walkabouts, which are about my favorite thing in the world when getting in the woods.
my Way is to save all the exertion for my work-outs back home - the field is not where i want to be getting hot and sweaty and wet and cold. - so a hawk and a machete and folding saw, with a smaller knife and a chisel will do whatever i have ever needed for extended periods in multiple environments and ecosystems. - and all that weighs less than one big chopper.
i pack my ECO Hawk with a TOPS folding saw for a miniaturized version of this concept.
a hawk is kind of
like a pocket knife to me - it is
enough most of the time, and when it is not, technique fills in until i can get to a tool that is more specialized, like a large axe.
i guess i am kind of a hypocrite - i always raise my eyebrows in concern when folks go to the woods with just a
folding knife, but i don't think twice about going to the woods with just a
little hawk.
at any rate,
our BUG heads weigh about
11 ounces, and are modified Trail Hawks. i try to improve the physics of the hawks by making the composite
Gen 1 handles more massive
internally at the ends, so that the hawks
turn faster and bite deeper. -
that's another distinction between a hatchet or Belt Axe - a true hawk has a
smaller bit, which gives it
more PSI.
so no one has to ask;
BUG heads.
an axe
chops.
a hatchet
hacks.
a hawk
pecks.
a good hawk should be like a
flying chisel on the end of a string that hits its
mark every time due to
good physics and ergonomics.
this is all hard to grasp until you try the right one usually.
HTH.
one more thought;
a lot of folks will call almost anything with a slip handle a tomahawk, and that's too bad IMHO;
one way that hawks really start strutting their stuff over other choppers is when you are chopping less vertically and more horizontally - a proper hawk usually has a
trailing mass, like
a hammer poll or a spike, which
assists in tracking quite a bit.
other good tools take advantage of this
same physical trait, like my headhunter brethrens'
aliwah;
it has a trailing inertial mass which allows it to track much like a tomahawk. - as an aside, my experience with the Isnag
aliwah happens to be why i am making tomahawks today.
aliwah. they have physics
much like a proper long hawk.
without the trailing masses, the
center of mass of a tool is generally forward, so you can get sort of a
flop-feeling to the chopper, and be more prone to glances and misses due to fatigue.
summary.
vec, ya whackjob, what's the bottom line?
the major differences between a hatchet and a hawk (IMHO as someone who has put hafts on hundreds of both) include but are not limited to;
1) a proper hawk has about an ounce of mass per inch of length, while a hatchet is heavier;
a good 19 inch hawk will weigh about 19 Ounces, while a good 19 inch hatchet will weigh more like
24 ounces to two pounds.
2) a hawk will have a trailing mass, an inertial body which assists in target indexing and tracking along all planes;
while a hatchet usually has the head's mass distribution all on the side of
the bit.
3) a proper hawk will have a smaller bit, about
two to three inches, while a good hatchet will be
three to maybe five inches in some cases.
4) a hatchet tends to be more wedge-like in bit cross-section, while
a hawk will be more like a knife, in their purist forms.
these are generalities.
sorry to talk your ear off, brother -
i just love hawks.
hawk-O-maniac vec