- Joined
- Apr 9, 2008
- Messages
- 1,319
The old shadow feels very overground and flimsy
The BladeForums.com 2024 Traditional Knife is ready to order! See this thread for details:
https://www.bladeforums.com/threads/bladeforums-2024-traditional-knife.2003187/
Price is $300 $250 ea (shipped within CONUS). If you live outside the US, I will contact you after your order for extra shipping charges.
Order here: https://www.bladeforums.com/help/2024-traditional/ - Order as many as you like, we have plenty.
Halbschaf next time you could order it to your hotel address in Alaska or some friend over there.
Worst case I could order it in California and mail it to you in Germany. But I don't know how much cost that would add (guessing $30) and in what mood the Customs beamten are.
![]()
For what it seems to be made, attack/defense, it will be more than strong enough.
No doubt about that.
So I'm wondering why most blades are of such oversized thickness. Would you say that the cs smatchet machete as well is stiff enough to use it as a boar hunter?Ah, yes.
I understand.
Forget about the " a knife must have a 6mm spine to be strong enough to stab ".
This is not the case at all.
The Cold Steel Smatchet and also the Cold Steel Bowie machete are both more than sturdy/stiff enough to stab into wood, let alone softer targets.
I have tested this on wood quite a few times.
The only thing I am going to change in the Smatchet , is the handle tickness/size.The ergonomics are great though.
Just a bit too much in circumference for my taste.So I'm gonna take the sandpaper to the polypropylene handle(precisely the belly of the handle) the make it a bit more convenient for my hand.
It is 10.5cm at the thickest part in circumference, and I want it to be 9.5cm or 10 cm at most.
But overall the CS Smatchet is awesome.In my opinion.As is the Cold Steel Warrior.
The Smatchet is really a kind of a short sword, and the same length as the Spartans had with their Xiphos during the Greco-Persian wars...
The CS Smatchet is excellent for boar hunting I would say.
I have stabbed the tip of the Smatchet into pine wood and twisted it out of it.
It just didn't bend at all (the tip).
The CS Bowie machete bend only at the very tip.
put a file against the tip, and file away that needle like tip 2 to 3 mm), and the tip is sturdy as well.
Why do many knives have the 6mm thickness?
A feeling of security I think.And some still break at that 6mm thickness (1095 steel , heat treat...)
Most machetes are not thick at all. Though many are easy to bend. But others are pretty stiff as well.
And they are tough.
The 2mm blade of the CS Kukri machete is maybe a little more flexible at the mid the blade.
I have had the CS Laredo Bowie.
And it looks great.
But for toughness and function, I would pick Cold Steel's cheaper versions.
Like the Smatchet or Bowie machete.
1055 steel is excellent.
And the handles are good too.
3 mm penetrates better/easier than 6 mm.
Especially with the sharpened upper 1/3th of the back of the blade.
I have read about it , that the wire tang handle broke.
Yes it was the handle that split. Not the wire that broke.
Exactly that .
I have read about it , that the wire tang handle broke.
It isn't a very sturdy construction.
Not near as sturdy as the machetes Cold Steel makes anyway.
It's not that more expensive is better.
You only have to look at the Mora , the humble Mora that outperforms knives many times more expensive.
And if it is a Bowie design you want.
The CS Bowie machete is an awesome blade as well.
It is light in hand, meaning very fast, you can slash and stab with it as any other expensive Bowie.
Not less, maybe better,even.
You can get it razor sharp as well.
And no worries about breaking it.
If it's the same guy I saw he was hammering a tree stump with the pommel. Beating things against a tree till they break doesn't prove how strong anything is - other than the tree![]()
Those other CS Bowie machetes I have are also quite recently bought.The Bowie Machete was discontinued for a long time, and then re-released a few years ago. the material may have changed between the two runs. I'm not sure.
I'll see if I can find out for you
Maybe you're right, and the handle of the bowie machete is sure enough. By thinking about it, this bowie can get my favourite. The blade shape looks similar to the Natchez bowie, imho.I wouldn't worry about that, it has a guard, not big , but large enough to not slip the hand onto the edge of the blade.
This was never a problem when I stabbed the Bowie machete into wood to test it.
Wood is much more of a blade stopper than softer targets so to say.
Have you seen some of the classic folding knives of the Italian mafia.
They don't have a guard at all.
And they were not used for peeling potatoes.
The Smatchet is a good choice though.I would pick that one too if having to choose.
The Bowie is lighter.
Funny thing.
I have had two of my friends(non-knife guys but sharp observing minds) let these knives hold and wanted to know their preference.
They both chose the Bowie machete.
And it was pretty instant, without too much thinking.
One find the Bowie machete more stable in the hand,opposed to the Smatchet 'wanting to move all the time'.Probably had to do with being a little more blade heavy of the Smatchet than the Bowie machete.The Smatchet is still very agile for its size.
It is always quite interesting what view non-knife people have on your knives .
By the way.
I stabbed a Mora Companion into a telephone book 800 pages deep.
Without any chance of slipping.
And that Mora has a tiny guard.
Didn't the Finnish troops in WWII use their Puukko's on the enemy?
That knife has often no guard at all...