Hello all,
Looking to pick up a new knife, and research (google fu) led me to Emerson. Searching through their web page it looked like the company produced knives with better ergonomics than I had yet come across. The handle designs looked very promising and they offered several blade shapes/designs (recurve, spear and drop points etc) in configurations more suited to a self defense / fighting knife than most other companies.
I haven't made the purchase yet, and am looking for thoughts from those of you that own one or both of the models I am considering. I have narrowed it down to either the Commander or the CQC 11. The fully recurve blade on the commander looks like it would handle all slicing applications very well, although I wonder if it has sacrificed some piercing ability. The CQC 11 looks to be a bit more in the middle.
Anyhow, what are your thoughts on each knife? Do any of you have both, and if so can you give a comparison?
Also, I have come across some reoccurring criticisms of Emerson's, and I am curious if you can offer your experiences here too;
- Pivot screw consistently comes loose (not a big deal, as I'm sure it isn't hard to adjust)
- Blade can develop horizontal play. Tightening enough to eliminate makes it tough to open
- Chisel ground, left side is cutting corners (I'm not overly concerned with this one either, really)
- Weak lock up. (I am used to Axis lock, as I currently carry a BM 520.)
- Liner locks are failure prone
- Emerson's liners are far too thin, at .05 or 1.15mm
- Titanium isn't strong enough at that width
- 154cm is good steel, but Emerson's is too soft ( 57-59 RC)
I know there are always naysayers, no matter how good a product. Since I have no experience with Emerson, I hoped some of you could shed some light on those two models, as well as on some of these criticisms that seem more common.
Thanks in advance. Any help will be appreciated.
Looking to pick up a new knife, and research (google fu) led me to Emerson. Searching through their web page it looked like the company produced knives with better ergonomics than I had yet come across. The handle designs looked very promising and they offered several blade shapes/designs (recurve, spear and drop points etc) in configurations more suited to a self defense / fighting knife than most other companies.
I haven't made the purchase yet, and am looking for thoughts from those of you that own one or both of the models I am considering. I have narrowed it down to either the Commander or the CQC 11. The fully recurve blade on the commander looks like it would handle all slicing applications very well, although I wonder if it has sacrificed some piercing ability. The CQC 11 looks to be a bit more in the middle.
Anyhow, what are your thoughts on each knife? Do any of you have both, and if so can you give a comparison?
Also, I have come across some reoccurring criticisms of Emerson's, and I am curious if you can offer your experiences here too;
- Pivot screw consistently comes loose (not a big deal, as I'm sure it isn't hard to adjust)
- Blade can develop horizontal play. Tightening enough to eliminate makes it tough to open
- Chisel ground, left side is cutting corners (I'm not overly concerned with this one either, really)
- Weak lock up. (I am used to Axis lock, as I currently carry a BM 520.)
- Liner locks are failure prone
- Emerson's liners are far too thin, at .05 or 1.15mm
- Titanium isn't strong enough at that width
- 154cm is good steel, but Emerson's is too soft ( 57-59 RC)
I know there are always naysayers, no matter how good a product. Since I have no experience with Emerson, I hoped some of you could shed some light on those two models, as well as on some of these criticisms that seem more common.
Thanks in advance. Any help will be appreciated.