In fact, value is mainly subjective and personal.
whatever knife you consider, the price you pay includes the cost of the material, the cost of the labour/assembly/control, the margin of the manufacturer and the margin of the reseller(s).
The more hype a product/brand has the higher will be the margins.
feoman economical point of view you will always get “less value” for a very hyped brand
as a consequence, we should get more value from our ZT than from our CRK
the problem with knives (cars/shoes/watches, choose your poison

) is that a lot of the perceived value will come from our personal perception
mid you like strong detent and snappy action , no way a CRK is worth the money compared to a ZT
if you like slocoer blades, better grinds, simple designs, etc. you may disregard ZT
ZT makes good knives.
Since I got into ZT I have no interest in most of their products.
Not because their are inferior to CRK, just because for the price I prefer owning 1 CRK rather than 2 ZT
That is just me.
You perceptions and feelings when handling tour knives can be the opposite and that is fine
is CRK overpriced? Yes I think so.
Is that a bad thing? No, they still deliver good quality and time proven designs
Is ZT overpriced? In some ways yes (good material but design and grind wise I have some complaints)
Is that a bad thing? No, their products are robust
IMO we shall not run after trends
We shall trust our feelings and be true to what we like and enjoy
you like ZT? That is good to be a ZT fanboy

You are sceptical about CRK? Try to handle one and make your own opinion
we don’t need to be “right” , we need to enjoy what we buy with our money
i had something like 10 ZT and sold most of them
I still have 3 and I think I will sold 2 of them
I still like ZT, IMO the best machining capabilities for the price
Do it prefer them to CRK? Really no
and for a lot of people it can be just the other way round
