- Joined
- Feb 3, 2009
- Messages
- 1,342
Dont squander credibility on a uninformed, knee-jerk opinion. Esee is makeing one of the most coveted knives of all time based solely on performance.
Which ESEE knife are your talking about? Junglas?
Yeah that extra 4 ounces or so can really be a killer, might have to get a hand cart or take someone with him to carry all that extra weight. ROFL![]()
Also all those extra 2 hour breaks needed carrying that heavy extra 4 ounces or so since it's so heavy.![]()
![]()
I've heard of hikers cutting an inch off their tootbrush to lighten their load. I guess in isolation any one little weight chop might seem ridiculous and pointless, but taken as a part of an overall mentality and effort to go ultra-light it starts to make sense. I personally believe the toothbrush cut is a bit much, no matter how you look at it. It is a tiny nub of plastic and not worth the sacrafice of comfort. Being weight conscious with steel, however, makes a bit more sense to me... however I personally would not sacrafice in the knife department on the basis of weight, but that's only because of my sickness
On to the ESEE 6 and RD6, or any other knife in that range. I agree that they aren't ideal choppers, especially compared to 7-12 inch blades. However, it seems that people of that opinion do consider 6-inchers (well, at least the ESSEE 6) good camp knives. Thing I don't get is, if you aren't going to be chopping with it, why would you choose such a large blade to use at camp? So many disadvantages at camp: weight hiking it in, kind of thick for food prep, kind of broad for food prep, kind of long for belt carry. I realize a lot of you disagree with what I listed as disadvantages, but it is inarguable that a thinner 4-inch blade would outperform something like an ESEE 6 for camp chores that do not include chopping (or batoning).