I've been thinking about the whole idea of a bug-out-bag. They are undoubtably a good idea to have but I think that the probability of being in a serious bug-out situation is slim.
It just seems that staying home would be safer in most scenarious.
The only scenarious where I can see bugging out are scenarious in which the harm/danger is localized. If the harm/danger is more widespread it would seem that there would be little improvement by leaving. This might include an attack focused on your city or serious weather problems that could breach your home (tornados or hurricanes).
bugging out may sound fun and living off the land is a blast but lets hear under what situations you would plan on bugging out and when you would plan on fortifying and staying home.
Why to we tend to focus more on bugging out than we do on fortifying our home against coming turmoil? I'm not discounting the idea, just wondering why. It would seem that many of us plan on bugging out when it may be wiser to stay home.
It just seems that staying home would be safer in most scenarious.
The only scenarious where I can see bugging out are scenarious in which the harm/danger is localized. If the harm/danger is more widespread it would seem that there would be little improvement by leaving. This might include an attack focused on your city or serious weather problems that could breach your home (tornados or hurricanes).
bugging out may sound fun and living off the land is a blast but lets hear under what situations you would plan on bugging out and when you would plan on fortifying and staying home.
Why to we tend to focus more on bugging out than we do on fortifying our home against coming turmoil? I'm not discounting the idea, just wondering why. It would seem that many of us plan on bugging out when it may be wiser to stay home.