The BladeForums.com 2024 Traditional Knife is ready to order! See this thread for details:
https://www.bladeforums.com/threads/bladeforums-2024-traditional-knife.2003187/
Price is $300 $250 ea (shipped within CONUS). If you live outside the US, I will contact you after your order for extra shipping charges.
Order here: https://www.bladeforums.com/help/2024-traditional/ - Order as many as you like, we have plenty.
"If our human civilization did crumble, wouldn't that just prove that the ideas and principles it was built upon were flawed and doomed to failure? After all, if those ideas and principles were strong and sound, then civilization wouldn't have crumbled in the first place."
Just for the hell of it, here are a few philisophical thoughts of mine on this subject-
If our human civilization did crumble, wouldn't that just prove that the ideas and principles it was built upon were flawed and doomed to failure? After all, if those ideas and principles were strong and sound, then civilization wouldn't have crumbled in the first place.
So, if you attempt to rebuild human civilization using the same methods, ideas, and principles that the old failed civilization was built on, wouldn't you just be setting up the new civilization for inevitable failure as well?
As somebody said before: it's not about what books but about what kind of people we are talking about. To rebuild civilization you'll need let's call it a "critical mass" of people with different skills, but with the same set of values; otherwise you will only have a mob, pulling in different directions, looking everyone for himself, with no sense of purpose.
I wonder where the roots of this lie. Does it have to do with our Abrahamic roots? I mean the Bible sure is a violent read, however those self same pitfalls were deliniated quite clearly to Moses. There are other cultures where this doesn't seem to be as prevalent. The San bushmen of the Kalahari, indigenous Australians, Tibetans/Nepalis/Bhutanis - Buddhists? Would it not serve the long-term greater good to create a new chapter to our spiritual works by adding or amalgamating all the good from those cultures that don't seem to fall victim to our quite common weaknesses. Am I wrong? There is definitely a whole lot romanticizing, assumption and lack of research in my quasi-theory.
I wonder where the roots of this lie. Does it have to do with our Abrahamic roots? I mean the Bible sure is a violent read, however those self same pitfalls were deliniated quite clearly to Moses. There are other cultures where this doesn't seem to be as prevalent. The San bushmen of the Kalahari, indigenous Australians, Tibetans/Nepalis/Bhutanis - Buddhists? Would it not serve the long-term greater good to create a new chapter to our spiritual works by adding or amalgamating all the good from those cultures that don't seem to fall victim to our quite common weaknesses. Am I wrong? There is definitely a whole lot romanticizing, assumption and lack of research in my quasi-theory.
I wonder where the roots of this lie. Does it have to do with our Abrahamic roots? I mean the Bible sure is a violent read, however those self same pitfalls were deliniated quite clearly to Moses. There are other cultures where this doesn't seem to be as prevalent. The San bushmen of the Kalahari, indigenous Australians, Tibetans/Nepalis/Bhutanis - Buddhists? Would it not serve the long-term greater good to create a new chapter to our spiritual works by adding or amalgamating all the good from those cultures that don't seem to fall victim to our quite common weaknesses. Am I wrong? There is definitely a whole lot romanticizing, assumption and lack of research in my quasi-theory. Just to lighten this a bit, a couple of movies come to mind; The Postman, The Village.
Thoughts?