Review : Arlee Niemi Megaladon custom folder

Cliff Stamp

BANNED
Joined
Oct 5, 1998
Messages
17,562
Joe has some comments on it here :

http://www.bladeforums.com/forums/showthread.php?s=&threadid=235127

Initial lock testing :

1) White knuckle test. This can open lock backs and very frequently unlocks liner locks, I could open a Spyderco Military this way, after it had been adjusted at the factory for example. Niemi's lock actually needs the handle slabs to open for the lock to release so all that this does it reinforces the lock (this is of significant importance on several of the lock tests) .

2) Spine whack. Using both a light and whippy motion and a hard impact swing, the tip of the blade was struck against a piece of wood in order for the effects of sudden fast shocks and heavy impact loads to either induce impaction of the mating surfaces or have something just get jarred apart. None of this had any effect, I worked up to swinging the knife hard enough to dig 1/4"+ holes in cedar.

3) I took a 4 foot piece of cedar baseboard and reduced it to shavings. I then repeated it with a piece of hardwood baseboard, which had a lot of splintering, and general wood breakage, and thus increased the torque on the lock. I went as heavy as possible, quickly, to maximise the strain on the lock, with no care to eliminate torques. I also cut deeply and twisted to break the wood out, as well as jerked back to pop the blade free. No effect on the lock.

4) I put the point in a piece of 4x4 and twisted the grip trying to get the slabs to open. This wasn't possible, they are far too rigid. I then resorted to having a friend push on the 4x4 while holding the knife as tight as I could and all I could do was twist the knife out of my hand. This combination of twisting and vertical loads can easily causes most liner locks to disengage and even break. I broke the liner on a Buck/Strider doing this with far less effort.

5) With the blade tip in the wood (just inserted in a crack) I bent the knife until the handle was at 30 degrees off of perpendicular (the wood was giving somewhat so the angle includes that deformation as well), the blade now had a slight visible bend. The handle slabs did not open at all. Unloading the knife, the blade returned to straight and the lock was not effected. This was about the maximum I could bend the knife using just my wrist strength. Because of the thickness of the handle liners, they are too rigid to bend significantly.

In short, the above places it above any lock that I have seen so far in regards to both raw strength as well as security. Before I did anything harder I then did some cutting tests as the blade profile is actually quite interesting and offers quite high cutting performance. The blade has a primary hollow grind, which I would call hollow relief as it isn't "T" shaped hollow which can wedge tightly at the top of the grind. The primary edge profile is 0.028" thick and 0.083" wide which is less than 20 degrees included. On top of this there is a more obtuse secondary edge bevel just barely visible .

Stock cutting tests :

The blade could push cut 3/8" hemp at ~14 lbs near the base of the blade and ~22 lbs near the tip. The increase in force was just due to the tip being slightly blunter. It only took 6.2 (0.2) slices to point a one inch hardwood dowel. For reference, the Cold Steel Twistmaster took ~12 slices on the dowel, and ~40 lbs on the cord. The cutting performance is well above average.

Sharpening :

Before the stock tests, but after the above wood cutting, the blade would not shave any more so I stropped it on CrO, ten passes per side. The shaving edge returned and there was little evidence of a floppy burr. The knife was then used in the kitchen on ripe tomatoes and peppers which it handled fine. Clean cuts with no mashing. Works very well for that kind of use, more shortly. This stropping was repeated several times during the work with the blade, it restored the shaving finish each time.

General blade shape :

The blade looked odd at first, upswept, but it actually isn't. The point profile is traditional tanto, with the point inline with the spine. There is just a curve in the spine which makes the point appear to rise. This curvature makes the blade fit smoothly in the grip. The shape gives a lot of curvature near the tip which enhances slicing ability as well as rocking cuts. It works very well on vegetation in the kitchen for this reason, as well as the lack of a guard allows cuts full to the cutting board. In addition because the blade is sharpened fully back, no choil, it works well as a paring knife. It was also used to trim the fat from some chicken legs as well as do rocking cuts straight through the bone, no significant blunting was induced, let alone edge damage.

Handle :

The handle fills the hand well, and is decently secure, no slippage was noted. The inside of the inside S30V liners is a little square though and did cause some irritation with extended use. A guard would also be appreciated by some to enhance security on thrusts .

Flickability :

The lever that opens the lock (it engages when the knife is closed as well as open), takes 6-8 lbs to rotate. This isn't a huge amount of force, but it a lot more than a smooth liner lock. This isn't a lock that you are likely to flick open and close for entertainment. I did a short cycle of 250 opens and closes to see if any slack would develop and I had to stop every 50 times. That being said, I carried the knife for awhile and used it to cut anything regardless of how trivial, it quickly became second nature to open. I just popped it with my thumb while holding the knife steady in a sideways sort of pinch.

Heavy lock work :

I chopped a couple of sections of the hardwood baseboard in two. Using the Camp Tramp (Swart Rat knives), sitting down, just swinging from the elbow it chopped easily in 12-14 hits. Standing up, doing fully power swings, it would take 3-7, and the board would be falling apart under the impacts. The folder took 38-42 hits. It took as many because I was holding back on the grip and the hits were landing really sloppy. The penetration was very high for the impact energy. No effect on the lock.

The blade was loaded vertically with 869 in.lbs of torque (just a particular weight I had a hand). To put this in perspective, if you could lift a 8 lbs sledge hammer by the very end of the handle with one hand, you would be of above average strength - that is less than 300 in.lbs of torque. I attempted to apply more of a load but could not keep the blade in position. In any case, the amount of steel that you need to break to cause the lock to release is many times that of normal folders. The break strength would be insanely high .

The blade was loaded sideways to see if I could pop the handle apart enough to get the lock to release, here is where I made a mistake. I thought I was loading the blade with 250 in.lbs, as I approached the maximum the blade snapped cleanly in half. The blade didn't bend significantly before it broke, and it was perfectly straight after the snap. When I checked the lever arm again the maximum torque was 350 in.lbs. I would estimate it was 275 - 325 in.lbs when it broke.

[this cut short the cutting part of the review]


The lock was then examined to see how it would handle dirt in the mechanism. I took ash from the wood stove (which also is used as a dust pail in the basement) and pushed in into the lock from all directions once it was closed. The blade still engaged fully when the lever was thrown. I then jammed it full of ash and dirt again when it was open and then flipped the bar and closed it. No problem. I then repeated it a few times. Unlike many other locks this one has the mating surfaces fully engaged when both open and closed so they can't get contaminated. The only way for this to happen would be to open it in a really dirty situation so for the brief period of time as the lock moves from open to closed dirt can get there.

I then put the remaining small piece of blade into a piece of wood and hammered on it with a 600 metal bar (mild steel), driving it into the wood, much harder than would be necessary to split it (seasoned pine, six months). A dozen hits total, the lock held fine, the spine of the blade was chipping under the impact of the hits. For comparison, using a piece of wood as a baton on an Arc-Lock from Sog (X-Ray Vision) the lock exploded under far less impacts. I then held onto the blade while it was struck by a friend two dozen times. He started off light, and worked up to heavy swings that were indenting the steel liners. The lock held.

When I went to unlock Niemi's knife , the nob that opens the liners cracked off, so it suffered a fracture during the second session of hammering. Popping the knife apart with a butter knife. It still opened and closed fine and was there was still no play in the lock up.

In short, the lock is very secure and extremely strong, the level of impacts necessary to damage the mechanism would have long since shattered the blade, and even when it did give way, the lock did not disengage but remained in tack, just the release mechanism gave way. I would be very curious about the ability of the lock if 3V was used, if it was coated well you should be able to avoid crevice corrosion which would be the main problem. With the addition of 3V's high fracture strength the lock should then able to withstand even the above pounding, which is rather extreme. In any case, it is still the most secure and strong lock I have seen to date.

If the above lock performance surprises you (it did me), you need to realize that the size of the mating surfaces that engage are many times that of locks like liners and lockbacks. In order for this lock to release you need to exert a level of force which is of similar magnitude to break a blade vertically, this is *very* high. Try it even with a cheap butter knife to see how difficult.

-Cliff
 
An interesting knife. Thanks for the write-up, Cliff. Also, thanks to Joe T. for his comments.
 
Cliff & Joe - thanks for the informative reviews!

Congratulations Arlee for the impressive performance of your knife lock!

Is the corner where the blade meets the integral lock radiused?


-Frank
 
I was pretty much expecting Cliff's comments to be similar to mine. The lock is as strong and reliable as I've seen a lock. I'm hoping Arlee makes enough sales on these to further refine his lock into one that will work in a non-automatic configuration as well.

One of the other points to note. Whenever someone says, "this is the strongest folder", I wince, because sometimes the "strongest folder" also has suspect edge geometry. This knife has excellent edge geometry with a top-shelf sharpening job, it cuts very very well. All this despite the fact that it very well may be "the strongest folder".


Joe
 
Arlee,


By “radiused”, I mean a rounded or curved corner to reduce the stress concentration effect of a sharp right angle corner.



-Frank
 
That's funny,I know what a radius is ;)
There are radii all over this knife.But looking down on the blades skinny side where the .250 tab(lock) meets the .125(blade)no,but its not a sharp corner either.Looks like it held up to Cliff's stress pretty well don't you think?
 
Arlee,

Yes, your knife lock’s strength, as Cliff described it in his review - is very impressive!


- Frank
 
Frank I suspected that the squarish nature of the intersection might be a weakness especially in regard to handling shock, however it isn't a functional one because the level of impact needed to cause a fracture would far in excess of what the blade would take. It would also be difficult to imagine needing to load the knife in the manner and extent described. You could easily cut nails and bolts under far less stress, let alone handle any kindling or baton wood work, so for any utility work it is far above what is necessary. The only thing that comes to mind is a combat block type of impact, where you would have to be resisting the impact as I was, trying to keep the knife from moving to maximize the level of impact, this isn't practical as not only does it generate large shocks to the knife but it is hell on your hand.

As Joe noted, I didn't expect this knife to cut overly well. I also didn't expect it to be very stable, lock wise as most people who claim very strong locks don't seem to actually test how easy it is to cause the lock to release, but instead focus on the vertical load necessary to break it. The latter is very high even for rather expensive folders, not anywhere near this folder in particular, but still high enough that it is rare to cause them to break in that plane in use. However it isn't difficult to get many locks to release via twisting motions or sudden jarring impacts. When you consider how many knife end folders will case spine whacks and even flicking abusive, it truely puts the level of ability of this knife into completely different class. Now on top of all this the blade actually cuts very well, easily well above average for blade that I have seen. A decently thin edge with a very acute primary edge bevel and a high hollow relief grind combine for a very effective cutting profile.

Arlee's confidence in getting the knife reviewed, which alone puts him above many others, is certainly justified from what I have seen.

-Cliff
 
Cliff or Joe:
Can you compare this lock with the AXIS lock in terms of strength and stability? Based on the single picture it looks like the lock would be hard to disengage accidently.

Joe,
I know you are very experienceed with the 710HSSr (in fact it was your writings that lead me to buy one), can you compare the two knives in terms of overall perfromance.

Cliff,

If I am not mistaken this is your first time using an S30V blade. Has using the steel changed your opinion of it? From what I remember you were not impressed with the specs that crucible claims.

My own experience (limited to a single knife so far, but I imagine there will be a few S30v and a 3v knife in my future soon) has indicated that S30v is a very fined grained steel that takes an exceptionally keen edge, easily comparable to any other stainless I have used. I ahve seen no durability issues, but it is a folder not a hard use knife. I expect to be using a few fixed blade S30V knives very soon.

Owen (who is the personification of a hard user) has had very good experience with the durability of Paul Bos heat treated S30V. I can't recall seeing a user having a bad experience with S30V. . . .

THanks,
Chad
 
Good informative review. Thanks Cliff.., Joe. It will be interesting to see if sales can keep these guys alive...


"Hunters seek what they [WANT].., Seekers hunt what they [NEED]"
 
Eric :

I have not used an axis though this gives me one more reason to buy one.

Has using the steel changed your opinion of it?

No. It snapped at an average load, with little flex and a very small elastic and no plastic deformation region, the spine also chipped readily under impacts . Nothing to get excited about toughness or overall durability wise, which is reflected in the specs from Crucible as to be expected as they are direct materials properties.

From what I remember you were not impressed with the specs that crucible claims.

In the context that it was a tool steel replacement, "stainless 3V", which it isn't, unless you would for example consider ATS-34 a stainless 5160, or similar.

It would be a fine upgrade for ATS-34 for light to medium duty where the edge loads were low and you wanted some extra wear resistance without having to go all the way to S90V and pay a lot more, and possibly deal with a functional loss in durability. Hunters, fillet knives, and light to medium use utility knives.

I can't recall seeing a user having a bad experience with S30V. . . .

Chipping problems have been seen with a few Sebenzas which borders on the very odd considering the fact that the RC was dropped. Though Reeve runs a very thin and acute edge on the Sebenzas and they are not heavy duty use folders in that respect anyway, though they of course cut very well.

In general it would be informative to know of those promoting S30V how they feel about ATS-34. If ATS-34 isn't giving them durability problems, and lots of makers use(d) it for large tactical knives and swords, it would be of no surprise that S30V would not either.

Considering how widespread ATS-34 is/was tactical wise I would expect S30V to induce similar market flooding once it catches on. The guys from Crucible should take a move from Walz who did a staggering job on promoting Talonite.

-Cliff
 
Cliff:
I have not used an axis though this gives me one more reason to buy one.
I would think for your style of use the 705 or 710 in M2 steel would be ideal. I have been happy with my Benchmade M2 blades, though I have used my 710 far more than my 705HS.

Re: Durability of S30V
First, it suprises me that Sebenza blades are chipping given the relatively soft heat treat that CRK is using on its S30V. I would have thought that if any durability problems surfaced it would be excessive edge roll or impacting, not chipping.

Second, you have described this knife as having a thin primary grind combined with a hollow relief (which sounds like a real high performance geometery). Given that description it sounds like this blade was balanced more towards high cutting efficiency, and that a very strong lock was an added bonus. With a blade, such as the one you described, I can't see a real high level of durability being possible regardless of the steel, the thin cross section results in lower durability.

The descriptions I have heard of S30V is the toughness of A2, wear Resistance of D2 and stainless like 440C. That sounds like an ideal steel to me, especially for light to medium class knives.
While I can see large choppers benifiting more from the toughness of a simple steel like 5160, in a smaller blade that toughness is not only uneeded, but the tradeoffs in terms of low wear resistance, lower strength, and rusting with alricity don't seem to balance out.




The guys from Crucible should take a move from Walz who did a staggering job on promoting Talonite.

Your statement seems to imply that by promoting Talonite Tom Walz made statement about its performance that are not true.

That is simply not the case. Tom Walz offered free samples of talonite to custom makers, whose customers reported their observations.

I have used several knives in Talonite (specifically a Talon, MEUK, Rinaldi TTK and Cammilus EDC), I found that it has properties not suited to my needs. I don't need the high levels of corrosion resistance, or high wear resistance from heavily carbided metal. I found that for my uses SANDVIK stainless (a very "cheap" steel) would readily outperform Talonite. Specifically I found that Talonite would deform too easily on my nylon cutting boards, and that I could not get an acceptable balance of thin edge perfromance and decent durability.

But, that does not mean Talonite was hyped, or is a bead product, it simply is not suited for my uses of a knife.

In the same vein, while researching a recent article I had a phone conversation with a lady at Latrobe (Timken Bearings), she said that extensive company research had shown that BG-42 would outperform 52100 over the vast majority of cutting applications. Considering that Latrobe also makes 2 kind of 52100 steel (one is a super pure double vacuum induction melt steel) I find that to be pretty credible. In some applications then, I would think that some stainless steels are more than a match for tool steels.

In addition, I have found that the highest performing knives I own are made with "cheap" stainless steel, like Opinels, Victorinox paring knives and Frosts Clipper Mora knives. Any effect that a "superior" steel would offer for these knives would be swamped out by geometry, heat treat and ease of sharpening, let alone the cost factor. Carbon steels are much the same, I just layed a new edge on an Ontario butcher knife (1095) and it will easily outcut any tactical knife of the same size (although its chopping ability is limited by lighht weight). The knife costs less than $4, and has been used to cut sod all summer, opened hundreds of bags of water softener salt, has been used during sprinkler repair, and gets thrown in the dishwasher after use. The only ill effects have been a shruken handle (the wood scales are loose on the pins) and a heavy patina.
 
Originally posted by Eric_Draven
Re: Durability of S30V
First, it suprises me that Sebenza blades are chipping given the relatively soft heat treat that CRK is using on its S30V. I would have thought that if any durability problems surfaced it would be excessive edge roll or impacting, not chipping.
Me, too, and it makes me wonder about people's definition of a "chip", or about the heat treat. To experience edge chipping from light use as some people have described with Benchmade and CRK would tell me something is awry-or that I have somehow managed to get two different S30V knives from two different makers, with two different HTs that are miraculously superior to the rest of the S30V knives out there (I can live with that:p). Seriously, I wonder if people are getting knives with a wire edge, and perceiving damage to that edge as "chipping", since my experience with the steel has been alot different.

With a blade, such as the one you described, I can't see a real high level of durability being possible regardless of the steel, the thin cross section results in lower durability.

The descriptions I have heard of S30V is the toughness of A2, wear Resistance of D2 and stainless like 440C. That sounds like an ideal steel to me, especially for light to medium class knives.
While I can see large choppers benifiting more from the toughness of a simple steel like 5160, in a smaller blade that toughness is not only uneeded, but the tradeoffs in terms of low wear resistance, lower strength, and rusting with alricity don't seem to balance out.
I think the exact same thing.

Cliff, I know you already covered this,
In the context that it was a tool steel replacement, "stainless 3V", which it isn't, unless you would for example consider ATS-34 a stainless 5160, or similar.

It would be a fine upgrade for ATS-34 for light to medium duty where the edge loads were low and you wanted some extra wear resistance without having to go all the way to S90V and pay a lot more, and possibly deal with a functional loss in durability. Hunters, fillet knives, and light to medium use utility knives.
...but I've got it in my head, and am going to dwell on some of the comments in general I've seen made about S30V, since my 2 cents is just burning a hole in my pocket.
I think if you look at what it is, instead of what it isn't, the big deal about S30V should be obvious. It's not so different from INFI, in that it combines a unique set of desirable qualities that make it more practical for a variety of uses than any competing product. You take greater strength, and toughness, than any of the common high-end stainless (or close) steels, corrosion and wear resistance that is right up there with the best of them, and bam!, you've surpassed AUS-8, 440C, ATS-34, 154CM, BG-42, D2, M2, VG-10, 440V, 420V, and on and on. You could say it's "obsoleted" ALL them, because it does what any of them can do, and does it as well or better.
Oh yeah, I know, 420V has greater wear resistance, but after cutting up a bunch of aluminum cans, whittling sticks, batoning the blade through some branches, and cutting 225 linear feet of cardboard with my Darrel Ralph ALB prototype (S30V@~58-59), and still having it scrape shave hair at the front recurve where the cutting was intentionally concentrated, it's pretty much a moot point, IMO.
No, using it isn't going to be a life-changing experience, and I'm sure I could survive if all my knives were made out of 1095, but it sure is interesting to see how ideas take shape, and products advance.

btw, sorry to get sidetracked on the review. Speaking of ideas taking shape, that's one interesting knife, with an impressive lock. Pretty it isn't, but some serious creative thinking went into that thing. Most intriguing folder I've ever seen.
 
Okay okay you guys win.I'll take the spring out and change the steel to??? Grind it to look just like every other pocket knife on the planet.I can even make the lock so it will fail like other folding knives when you hit it on something hard or twist it or push to hard.
Ya right,I can make it just like every other knife!I dont tkink so!


Ya it's ugly,Ya it's heavy,but it cuts and it's damn strong,and you don't have to take my word for it any more,just read the reviews.

Am I a good pitch man or what :yawn:
 
Posted by Eric_Draven on 01-13-2003 05:11 PM:

[Sebenza's chipping]

I would have thought that if any durability problems surfaced it would be excessive edge roll or impacting, not chipping.

Yes, so would I. It could be ductility failures, however I would expect them to also be more common with BG-42 as it was ran harder. It could be that Reeve changed the geometry slightly on the S30V ones.

With a blade, such as the one you described, I can't see a real high level of durability being possible regardless of the steel, the thin cross section results in lower durability.

The thin cross section would increase the ductility, well actually it wouldn't but it would appear to as under the same arc it would have to deform less thus it would be able to bend more. The thin cross section does lower the strength of course, but it also would not make that dramatic an effect on impact toughness as the steel type would, which can be much greater than 10:1 . The edge durability is actually very high because of the large difference in the primary and secondary edge profiles which produce an edge similar to a convex one with an extreme sweep.

[S30v]

... toughness of A2, wear Resistance of D2 and stainless like 440C.

The impact toughness through the grain (how knives actually fracture) is that of D2. Recently they have started promoted grain splitting impact toughness for CPM steels as they fare much better in this regard. Of course in knife use there are never significant loads along such vectors as to make this significant which is why you never see splitting fractures either from prying or impacts. The only way to generate them would be from heavy side loads, hit the flat with a hammer, that kind of thing. Even then you get strong perpendicular fracture components, ie. the blade will never split from point to choil.

Your statement seems to imply that by promoting Talonite Tom Walz made statement about its performance that are not true.

That was not where I was going, more that what he was able to make out of what he had was very impressive. Though I do feel it was extremely overhyped in the beginning. If you look back, Waltz even had Talonite blades promoting a higher durability than those of Busse Combat, though he quickly removed the name. Now the low RC and overall low durability are well known drawbacks, these were ignored and actually defended back when the Talonite push started. The low RC was defended because the carbides were harder and thus the RC was not meaningful that of course is nonsense and steel has carbides as well which was not stated. The low tensile strength was not meaningful because knives are not pulled apart in use, of course you could also argue for AISI 420 in the same manner. As well is the point that the lower RC means the edge much be signicantly thicker than steel knives, defended because of the cutting power of the "carbides" in Talonite. Of course the tensile strength correlates highly to edge deformation resistance and the RC to impaction and significant changes in geometry can't be made up for by any "aggressive" cutting nature of the blade material. It is also well known now that outside of its low durability, it can not hold a high performance crisp edge as long as steel, which is simply a matter of the edge rolling faster. Plus of course he was able to introduce Talonite as "new" when now it is accepted that Stellite 6k which had been around for quite some time is very much a similar material and now is even chosen over Talonite for example by Robertson.

In some applications then, I would think that some stainless steels are more than a match for tool steels.

For some tools steels yes, for example S90V at 63-64 RC with have much greater edge holding than 5160 at 60 RC for light cutting. However 1095 at 66 RC will outlast the S90V on most materials and M2 at 66 RC on all materials.

Posted by OwenM on 01-14-2003 04:05 AM:

You take greater strength, and toughness, than any of the common high-end stainless (or close) steels, corrosion and wear resistance that is right up there with the best of them

There is no gain in impact toughness, ductility or tensile strength that I have seen first hand or on specs.

420V has greater wear resistance

It also has a higher hardness, as does M2. Plus I would be very surprised to see anyone claim that S30V and M2 at 59 RC is a durability advantage for S30V. That would seem to me to be M2 in any case outside of corrosion resistance. D2 at 62 RC would be a better light utility knife for all areas outside of corrosion resistance as well. For ATS-34 and the like, yes I would consider it pretty much a direct upgrade, though not a huge one. It would depend on the cost. I have not looked a the corrosion resistance yet, so if that is much more (say like AISI 420), it would indeed be a huge advantage.

A.R. Niemi

I'll take the spring out ...

The problem with this isn't functionality, but legality. With it probably being classified as an auto, the customer base is reduced. It is just a case of having to deal with a very stupid law.

-Cliff
 
I dont understand how a simple lock test could turn into a disscusion on blade materials.If I remember right this was a disscussion on the lock mechanism itself.And from what I have read it is a very fine mechanism.
 
Back
Top