I recently picked up a CRKT KISS. Literally, I just found it on the ground. Despite the fact that it was free, I think it's a lousy value.
First of all, the serrations are about as dull as a butter knife. This knife looks to have been used very little -- the straight part of the edge has obviously been sharpened, but is very little worn, and the rest of the knife shows almost zero wear and tear. The serrations on this specimen, which appear entirely undamaged, still will barely cut slivers off of my thumbnail.
Second, the lock on this knife is extremely inconvenient. I have never had a problem with closing a knife one handed, but this one is difficult to shut one-handed due to the positioning of the lock in relation to the clip and the handle, as well as the potential worry about cutting oneself on the closing blade. On the plus side, the lock appears relatively strong. I opened the blade slowly, then rapped the back fairly hard on my desk. This didn't faze the lock at all. I then decided to test for blade-play. There was absolutely none. The blade locks up solidly, with no play in any direction. However, with slight pressure, using just my bare hands, I was able to flex the blade/handle juncture significantly in any direction. I definitely wouldn't want to use this knife for any sort of hard cutting.
Regardless of this, I doubt one would be able to, given the impossibly poor handle economics. Given the enormous, unwieldy clip, and the total lack of any sort of grooves, choils, or any other of those gripping devices we take for granted on a well-designed knife, I find it difficult to hold this knife with any degree of confidence, and I would much rather use my teeth than this knife in any sort of "tactical" situation, not necessarily a fight, but rather in what James Mattis describes as a "sport/utility" use, such as in whitewater rafting, climbing, or any other situation in which knife-handling conditions are not ideal.
In conclusion, this knife might make a cute money clip, but I'd rather have a Spyderco Cricket, because then I could cut stuff.
Note to any satisfied KISS owners: I do not intend this as a personal attack on you or your knife. I am well aware that the provenance of my test sample is doubtful, however I don't believe the concerns which I have expressed above would be greatly affected by the condition of the knife, as most of them relate to design, rather than execution. In fact, I am rather impressed by the fit and finish of the knife, especially given its relatively low price, and place of manufacture. Comments are welcome.
First of all, the serrations are about as dull as a butter knife. This knife looks to have been used very little -- the straight part of the edge has obviously been sharpened, but is very little worn, and the rest of the knife shows almost zero wear and tear. The serrations on this specimen, which appear entirely undamaged, still will barely cut slivers off of my thumbnail.
Second, the lock on this knife is extremely inconvenient. I have never had a problem with closing a knife one handed, but this one is difficult to shut one-handed due to the positioning of the lock in relation to the clip and the handle, as well as the potential worry about cutting oneself on the closing blade. On the plus side, the lock appears relatively strong. I opened the blade slowly, then rapped the back fairly hard on my desk. This didn't faze the lock at all. I then decided to test for blade-play. There was absolutely none. The blade locks up solidly, with no play in any direction. However, with slight pressure, using just my bare hands, I was able to flex the blade/handle juncture significantly in any direction. I definitely wouldn't want to use this knife for any sort of hard cutting.
Regardless of this, I doubt one would be able to, given the impossibly poor handle economics. Given the enormous, unwieldy clip, and the total lack of any sort of grooves, choils, or any other of those gripping devices we take for granted on a well-designed knife, I find it difficult to hold this knife with any degree of confidence, and I would much rather use my teeth than this knife in any sort of "tactical" situation, not necessarily a fight, but rather in what James Mattis describes as a "sport/utility" use, such as in whitewater rafting, climbing, or any other situation in which knife-handling conditions are not ideal.
In conclusion, this knife might make a cute money clip, but I'd rather have a Spyderco Cricket, because then I could cut stuff.
Note to any satisfied KISS owners: I do not intend this as a personal attack on you or your knife. I am well aware that the provenance of my test sample is doubtful, however I don't believe the concerns which I have expressed above would be greatly affected by the condition of the knife, as most of them relate to design, rather than execution. In fact, I am rather impressed by the fit and finish of the knife, especially given its relatively low price, and place of manufacture. Comments are welcome.