The BladeForums.com 2024 Traditional Knife is ready to order! See this thread for details:
https://www.bladeforums.com/threads/bladeforums-2024-traditional-knife.2003187/
Price is $300 ea (shipped within CONUS). If you live outside the US, I will contact you after your order for extra shipping charges.
Order here: https://www.bladeforums.com/help/2024-traditional/ - Order as many as you like, we have plenty.
Just double checked my pic. Looks like 1953, possibly 1933What a great haul!
What year is the Rixford Kentucky?
That saw is gorgeous
They could be seen as duplicates, just 2 different finishes.Are three of these under scrutiny for being legitimate wedge patterns? Or duplicate patterns, different names?
All good guess! They may have held onto both names as not to let go of the reputation of the OS name. Or they didn't change the name on the bank account. It's weird though.Now we are talking some good old new england secrets, hand shake deals and odd axe lore!
I do not have any information sadly to add.
I will say that perhaps over at Rixford they were not ready to let go and there was some leniency given for this period of time.
Was it one cantankerous office staffers paper work you got ahold of that was maybe related to family or top executives and untouchable?
Could it have been a leniency given between two top decison makers for ole time sake after they became incorporated and then ended when the agreement decided upon came to its end date.
Or, if the case was a verbal bond, what i would tend to think, is that one of the agreement makers ended their tenure and so ended the leniency of a verbal bond, old habits and traditions.
What if it was just one staffers denial of change? Good Old Puritan New England Fear of Change
Absolutely beautiful!!Rixford Awesomeness
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
R47 Rixford
Kentucky
3lbs / 6¾long / 4⅜bit
I'd go with 53. If it were 33 the typeface of "Rixford" would be different.Just double checked my pic. Looks like 1953, possibly 1933
I'd go with 53. If it were 33 the typeface of "Rixford" would be different.
Here's an O.S. Rixford broad hatchet, likely made from 1880-1896, hardened poll and all!
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
Os Rixford didn't die until 1911 it's very possible he wasn't keen on the new name and did some scribbling in defiance of the change.I’m happy you started this thread Miller! I have a Rixford mystery and an axe to go with it.
The axe is a beautiful 3 ½ pound wedge pattern (with chips in the bit, but I don’t care too much about that). The two stamps are “Rixford Mfg...<fade>” and the weight, “3 ½”. What’s most remarkable to me about the weight stamp is that it’s on the poll. I’ve never seen another like it. In fact, I wondered if it was a fake for a while. Then one day I was flipping through the 1887 Rixford catalog, and surprise! The illustrations of the axes in the catalog have a weight draw on the poll. My first clue.
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
It got me wondering about the date of the axe. Here are the parts to the puzzle (and some very puzzling parts) I have so far.
I’ll also stick in here that the Thomas Register of American Manufacturers from 1905 gives the name Rixford Mfg co and the Hendricks' Commercial Register of the United States from 1916 gives the name Rixford Mfg co.
- While the company started in 1812, for this purpose, I’m really only interested in its life as an axe manufacturer, which started in 1880 in VT. At that time it was the O. S. Rixford Manufacturing Co. run by Oscar S. Rixford.
- In Tom Lamond’s book ‘Axe Manufacturers & Purveyors of Northern New England’, he states that in 1896 the name changed to Rixford Manufacturing Co.
- Then in 1900 the company was incorporated under the name Rixford Manufacturing Co, and Oscar H. Rixford became president.
- Finishing this thread, Oscar A. Rixford became president in 1926. Anything after this is irrelevant to this mystery.
So based on the above, I would be dating this axe from 1896 to whenever they stopped stamping the poll with the weight. The 1923 Rixford catalog has illustrations of axes without weights on the poll, so I’ll put a pin on that date. So somewhere between 1896 and 1923. But there’s more.
A few years ago I spent some time digging through the Rixford Archives at the University of Vermont and took some pictures of documents I thought were interesting. Here is where things get puzzling.
So they were using O.S. Rixford stationary 6 years after the suggested change of names, finally printed Rixford Mfg co stationary in 1902, but crossed the name out to write O.S. Rixford for at least another 5 years. I don’t know what, if anything, the means regarding what they would have been stamping their axes with, but it’s hurting, not helping, me date my axe.
- A document dated ‘187_’ has the heading O.S. Rixford- makes sense
- Documents dated ‘1881’ has the heading O.S. Rixford- makes sense
- A document dated ‘1890’ has the heading O.S. Rixford- makes sense (also a pic having the weight poll stamp)
- A document dated ‘Nov 1900’ has the heading O.S. Rixford- this is 4 years after the changed to Rixford mfg co
- A document dated ‘May 1902’ has the heading O.S. Rixford- this is 6 years after the changed to Rixford Mfg co and two years after being incorporated!
- A document dated ‘Oct 30 1902’ has the heading Rixford Mfg co- OK, making sense again
- A document dated ‘Nov 1902’ has the heading Rixford Mfg co, but it’s crossed out to read O.S. Rixford, really messed up, right?!
- Documents dated up until ‘1907’ have the heading Rixford Mfg co, but it’s crossed out to read O.S. Rixford, 5 years after they started printing Rixford Mfg co, they are still crossing it out to read O.S. Rixford?!
Does anyone have any information, specifically around this time period, that might help (OK, even if it hurts)?
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()