- Joined
- Oct 8, 1998
- Messages
- 8,917
Originally posted by Jailhack
scotjute,
These so called "studies" are just like most other ones. They show only the worst case scenarios. Of course a bite by a Rottie or any other large breed will result in more damage than if bit by a Poodle or any other small dog. These studies are a joke.
Another bogus thing about the studies is stated right in your own "facts". They only show "severe" or "fatal" attacks. Once again, they don't mention overall number of bites.
Correct, and you will please take notice that he simply ignored what I wrote earlier about a careful examination of all of these breeds of dogs that do NOT attack.
That's the flaw in citing a statistic out of context. If there are 500,000 Rotties in a given year in this country and there are 4 fatalities from Rotties, that is statistically NOTHING, and the only people that throw that up in the air to see if it sticks on the ceiling are people that are fundamentally against the ownership of certain breeds of dogs and have nothing other than skewed statistics to back up their wailing.
You see this all the time in The Gun Control Debate and various discussions about "Taboo Knives." It's a red herring for people who simply do not like certain things, in this case, large breeds of dogs, to rant about the danger of them.
I don't like it when children are mauled because of dangerous dogs for whatever reason, it actually brings a tear to my eyes to see these things on the news.
Just as it does someone who does not safely operate their motor vehicle or they operate it while impaired and they kill children too.