The hardness of the S30V in Spyderco knives is RC 58-59. It is precisely the hardness given for a Sebenza in S30V.
There were a lot of discussions at the Chris Reeves Forum about the hardness - why 58-59 and not 60-61, etc. No clear answer from CR guys except 'Chris knows well what is best for you', etc.
Now, I believe that Sal knows well what is good for us. Still, we have very often read beautiful explanations by him. Maybe , some of the those questions /comments are interesting for other forumites too.
In my opinion/guess a hardness lower than 60 is chosen in order to get a knife which is tougher (less chiping). However, it seems to me that it makes sense to have higher hardness for smaller knives which are big cutters. For example, Delica in VG-10 is RC 60-62, but Police in VG-10 is RC 59-60 (according to the Spyderco www site).
I would like to see some dedicated cutters (a la Delica, Centofante, etc) in S30V steel in the RC 60-62 range, and the other, robust knives, in the lower range.
Is my philosophy wrong?
Regards,
Franco
There were a lot of discussions at the Chris Reeves Forum about the hardness - why 58-59 and not 60-61, etc. No clear answer from CR guys except 'Chris knows well what is best for you', etc.
Now, I believe that Sal knows well what is good for us. Still, we have very often read beautiful explanations by him. Maybe , some of the those questions /comments are interesting for other forumites too.
In my opinion/guess a hardness lower than 60 is chosen in order to get a knife which is tougher (less chiping). However, it seems to me that it makes sense to have higher hardness for smaller knives which are big cutters. For example, Delica in VG-10 is RC 60-62, but Police in VG-10 is RC 59-60 (according to the Spyderco www site).
I would like to see some dedicated cutters (a la Delica, Centofante, etc) in S30V steel in the RC 60-62 range, and the other, robust knives, in the lower range.
Is my philosophy wrong?
Regards,
Franco