s35v compared to s30v for a hunter

Joined
Jan 12, 2010
Messages
51
Who has any experience using these steels
I have both steels and looking and making a special knife for a good friend,
Any advice would be good
 
S35 is a little less prone to chipping in my experience. Also from a makers standpoint it will be easier to work with and finish. To get the best performance I've heard that 60-61rc is the ideal hardness.
 
Hey Trooper :) I've worked with both S30V & S35VN. S35VN is my preferred choice considering the 2 you mentioned, both in performance & upkeep for the user in the field.

Like every blade steel we use, correct grind/edge geometry, combined with proper thermal cycles & heat treat technique is imperative in bringing out the full potential of this material. And for that matter, every other piece of blade stock we use.

Like S30V don't skip the cryo. Although there may be a lot of misinformation on the web regarding cryo, one aspect that's not in dispute is it's ability to transform retained austenite (in steels that are prone to develop it) to untempered martensite.

Per Verhoeven, when using high alloy air harden steels, to help reduce retained austenite :
- avoid the higher Data Sheet listed austenitizing temperatures.
For S35VN HT in my shop …. I use the mean temperature of 1950*F.
- Avoid excessive soak times (for 3/16" stock I soak 20 min at temp)
- Use interrupted oil quench vs. plate or positive pressure air quench (I oil quench the blade to just <1000*F then positive pressure air quench using a cold air gun to ~ 100-150*F)
- Following the quench, move directly to cryo. Don't allow the blade to rest at room temperature for even 5 minutes.
Don't snap temper or "1st cycle" temper prior to cryo. Pre-cryo tempering or "setting the blade down for the night after quench" will most likely result in some stabilizing of the retained austenite. Personally, I always keep the HT cycle moving forward. Again, per Verhoeven, austenite that has been allowed to stabilize can make conversion to martensite very difficult.

If moving from quench directly to cryo concerns you, to decrease the potential risk of fracturing or micro-cracks resulting from going directly to cryo from quench, you can reduce the temp more slowly by placing the blade above the LN prior to full immersion. FWIW, in my first experiments using D2, I did it both ways. After examining samples using fluorescent dye penetration inspection and later, SEM inspection, and finding not a single micro-crack or fracture (as in none) I now go directly to a slow full immersion in the LN following the quench.

As is standard practice, all cold treatments (LN, Dry Ice + Acetone, etc.) should always be followed by tempering. In the case of CPM S35VN I use (3) 2 hr. cycles at 475*F. I quench in water between each cycle (right out of the tempering oven) so that I can go immediately back in for the next cycle.
The end result of the above mentioned procedure for S35VN, in my shop, results in a final HRC of ~60, + or - a point

I always try to give credit to those who paved the way before me, and in the case of Heat Treat, that would be Kevin Cashen. Speaking of custom knife making, Kevin has been a Tour de Force in regards to teaching proper heat treat technique and listing of resources on the subject.
The best he’s passed on have been:
"Steel Metallurgy for the Non-Metallurgist" by John D. Verhoeven , call # TN705 .V45 2007
“Fundamentals of Physical Metallurgy” by John D. Verhoeven, call # TN690 . V46 1975
“Tool Steel Simplified” by Frank Palmer, George V. Luerssen, Joseph S. Pendleton Jr. 1978 (sorry, no # for this one)

My final thanks in regards to my extremely anal Heat Treat Procedures go to Nathan Carothers (at BF we know him as “Nathan the Machinist”). His ongoing experiments with D2 steel (among others) and his findings related to edge retention and stability following cryo was impossible to ignore, (for me anyway), and the final nudge I needed to pursue further knowledge regarding the subject. Thanks Buddy :thumbup:

There’s my experience with S35VN Trooper. Sorry for the long winded response – I hope it helps you :thumbup:


;)
 
Hey there,
that is no long winded explanation there is a lot of awesome information in all that. Very much appreciated. The expensive thing here is australia is setting up cryo. I am looking at setting up in my shop instead of sending away for cryo. I have traditionally plate quenched and used my plates out of the freezer.
I have just ordered over 1000 dollars worth of steel from Admiral. I would of ordered more but the freight to Australia is almost half the order ! You cant get steel in Australia you have to import it. To get a sheet of Elmax was 5000 ! So all this HT and user input is valuable in more than one way.
 
For the sub-zero treatment, try using kerosene and dry ice. It will reach close to -100F/-73C, which is cold enough to hit the Mf. Of course, liquid nitrogen will be even better, but tat may n=be harder to set up.
 
Awesome thinking 99 ! that will be the go. Ill experiment with your suggestion easier to set up and cheaper.
Thanks a lot mate
 
bladsmth,
is kerosene better for "cryo" than acetone?
 
Please separate "sub-zero [ -100 F ] from " Cryo" [ - 300 F " from
 
I prefer acetone, but in Australia, he may have easier access to kerosene. Both will work.
 
Bladsmth, thanks!

Mete, will do! That's why I put it in quotes... But point taken, it pays to be specific!
 
Well, I'm no expert... And anyone out there that knows better, please interject! Get a container that is cold proof that is long enough to contain your work and the liquid plus some extra working room. If your container is not insulated, make sure that the surface it is sitting on is not effected by cold either (i.e. not your garage floor, as cement cracks when it gets this cold... Ask me how I know!). Make sure your container is stable. Put dry ice in the container, pour liquid in. Stir with something other than your finger. Attach your blade to a length of wire or something, immerse for an appropriate amount of time. (How long? No idea!) I'm willing to bet someone can tell you how long, just not me.
 
I used to go 2 hours on the sub zero with dry ice. Reading info by those in the metallurgy know informed me that with sub zero you do not gain from a soak at the -100f temp as the austensite to maartinsite conversion is complete when the steel goes to -100f and then nothing more happens. I have gone to 30 min in the dry ice bath and can notice no change. With true cryo with liquid nitrogen the steel does some more with the carbide formation and this does call for soak time. I also do the bath right after the quench. NO snap temper. I also do another short 30 min trip into the dry ice bath after the first temper. I believe it gets me a tiny bit more.
 
Interesting information, how does S35v compare to CPM 154, in regards to edge holding, toughness, and sharping ease? I made a few from S30V and had them heat treated by Paul Bos and they held an edge forever, but were a royal PITA to sharpen and have since went to CPM 154 as my go to stainless.
 
Amazingly informative and generous comment by David Wesner!

I agree- I saved that one.
One thing that I'm a little puzzled by: I've always read that the RA conversion happens immediately during the subzero/cryo quench, and that soaking is not needed as long as the blade is chilled to proper temp.
Anyone have info on that?
Thanks
 
Will,
I find S35VN tougher than CPM154 by a noticeable amount. It really holds an edge well, too.

elementfe,
The conversion to martensite from austenite happens instantaneously as soon as the steel is fully at -100F. A half hour is more than long enough to assure the steel has dropped to the temp of the bath. The bath will last quite a while in nothing but a steel pan with no insulation. Set the pan on a piece of plywood.
 
Back
Top