- Joined
- Jun 25, 2001
- Messages
- 8,474
Sean
if indeed at 58 HRC I'd lean more toward bevel/tip thickness rather than edge geometry . that's a lot of tip lost. On your tester do you have your test blocks?
I think the Rock needs to be retested and make sure you didn't have a fracture in the steel,
from the tip to 2/3 back looks funky
it looks like the brake started from the edge by looking at the angle of brake
if it broke at 90 deg in the tree.
but if it were because it's to hard , it just snapped the spine and the crack followed to the edge,
even if the edge flexed in the process from being thin there, the crack from the spine brake would follow though.. JMO
this style is not meant for target practice on tree's
if indeed at 58 HRC I'd lean more toward bevel/tip thickness rather than edge geometry . that's a lot of tip lost. On your tester do you have your test blocks?
I think the Rock needs to be retested and make sure you didn't have a fracture in the steel,
from the tip to 2/3 back looks funky
it looks like the brake started from the edge by looking at the angle of brake
if it broke at 90 deg in the tree.
but if it were because it's to hard , it just snapped the spine and the crack followed to the edge,
even if the edge flexed in the process from being thin there, the crack from the spine brake would follow though.. JMO
this style is not meant for target practice on tree's