Which is better? Well, that question usually requires the standard reply of better in what way? But with the Apogee, I think it is safe to say that generally, the Apogee is better.
So, how is the Apogee better?
It is bigger, or at least the large Apogee is. More handle, more blade, still carries very comfortably.
The handle has more contours. Better grip. The size of the handle is also an advantage for retention.
The blade of the Apogee is CPM420V versus BG-42. 420V is just better. It is at least as tough, probably tougher, and is more wear resistant than BG-42.
The Apogee is prettier.
The Apogee is custom made. You can ask Darrel for a pretty wide variety of blade variations. I like the standard recurve, but I have seen other Apogees with Sebenza-like blades on them.
Darrel is not only one of the most talented, he is also one of the nicest guys in the business. It is tremendous luck for me that he came down from heaven to make knives for users. And speaking of using knives, I have been fairly hard on my Apogee, and it just soaks up the hard use. The handle finish of the Apogee shows wear much less than the bead blasted finish on the standard Benza.
A lot of how people feel about the two knives will depend on personal preference of course. The Sebenza is a great knife and it is very precisely made. It really has no faults, but the Apogee is just better.