- Joined
- Sep 8, 1999
- Messages
- 90
<font face="Verdana, Arial" size="2">Originally posted by Joe Talmadge:
... Next question: the Reeves more or less claim to have perfected the integral lock (though they put it much less coarsely than that). How does Tom's integral lock stack up? Tweaking, torquing, squeezing -- anyone ever have problems?</font>
You're killing me, Joe, but here goes:
- Tweaking: slight lateral blade play in the Med Recurve when gripping the blade and forcing it side to side. No lateral blade play in XLG Recurve or Beefy T.
No vertical blade play in any of them. But material may play a role in this: Beefy T: .200" thick blade spine, .187" thick handles; XLG: .156" blade, .144" handles; Med Recurve: 1/8" blade, 1/8" (?) handles.
- Torquing: (all left-handed models) stabbing each into a piece of wood and twisting the handle in a clockwise direction, each TNT disengages. Non-issue for me as Sebenza does the same thing.
- Squeezing: Neither any of the TNTs disengage resulting from a white knuckle grip. However, you may have to ask kawanin to try this as he is much stronger than I.

<font face="Verdana, Arial" size="2">How does Tom handle reducing the lock tension? Vertical cutouts ala the Sebenza? A long horizontal slot ala the Benchmade Pinnacle?
Thanks!
Joe</font>
Tom employs "vertical cutouts ala the Sebenza," but on the outside of the locking bar instead of the inside. Rob Simonich seemed to agree that this was the right place to put it as he was examining my XLG in Oregon and said it has to do with mathematics, particularly in regards to circles and curves. In regards to this issue, either of them can do a much better job of explaining this more clearly.
Jerome