The consensus I think; different task require different edges, along with differing geometries. With this, mix in different expectations for a given bevel and edge. Some combinations cancel each other out; like the convex bevel sporting a hollow ground edge. The convex bevels add strength, the hollow ground edge takes away from that strength. There are quite a few of these combinations around.
Looking at it as a woodworker, I prefer no added angle on the edge of a flat ground chisel. Most task in a wood shop use the flat ground bevel surface along with the edge. Looking at it as a knife maker and user, I see it differently. The task that can be accomplished with a knife blade, are many compared with the few that are asked of a chisel.
Also, sharpening a flat chisel in the woodworking shop takes seconds, on a horizontal disk, holding the proper angle. Same for a most any blade, including knife blades. If you can't sharpen it, its worthless.
This discussion leads to the obvious, elephant in the room; [I despise the phrase] Can you take the same liberties with a "Scandi" ground blade; after all it's two chisels back to back. For this reason I grind few Scandi style blades; its to hard for the average knife user to sharpen.
For me, making original knives, with appropriate grinds, carrying the proper edges for their required usages, is a challenge. That's what makes knife making so satisfying; the challenge!
Happy grinding, Fred
PS. If a chisel ground blade has a secondary grind at its cutting edge; it is no longer a chisel grind; its a flat ground bevel with a secondary grind at its edge.