Whew
sorting the wheat from the chaff here is like the hunting the needle in the hay stack.
Doomonyou, keep the Colt amigo. Folks make a mountain of a molehill regarding the care, feeding and manual of arms drills with the Colt, but in all reality, the same drills apply to most all auto pistols. A stovepipe is cleared the same on Colts, S&W, Glocks and SIGs. Failure to feed is handled the same on all the above, rap, tap, bang. The only operation the 1911 pistol has that the Glock does not, is the manual safety. The cocked and locked carry does require knowledge of the handling of a 1911. You can learn to shoot and shoot well the 1911.
Trigger management is different, but that is a learned skill on either firearm. Remember the 1911 in its infancy did not have a manual safety, just like the Glock.
The reputation the 1911`s acquired for lack reliability is largely based on the Series 70 and pre 70`s failure to feed HP and SWC ammo reliably without reliability tune up.
It is important to remember, 1911 was designed to around the 45acp, 230 gr Hardball at 855 fps. So when the trend towards hollow points started up in the 60`s the 1911 required a tuning package. (This is what gave Bill Wilson, Ed Brown and several others all the business they could handle working up the 1911 for hollow point and semi wad cutters). Prior to this the 230 gr hardball at 850 fps was the standard. It also worth noting that the only reason the 9mm even came in to the police, self defense area was the advent and availability of frangible and reliably expanding hollow point ammo. Hell, I can remember the days of shooting 9mm hollow points through 6x6`s and having little or no expansion, the 45acp was worse, remember, the 45 travels at lower velocity.
If you can find any smith that hand makes custom glocks, SIG`s , S&W`s and has folks standing in line to pay $3000.00 after a year or two wait, please post his or her name. I can name several smiths that have pistoliaros standing in line to buy $3000. 00 carry 1911 `s. I know this for fact, as Ive been in the line and continue to stand in several others.
This is a summary of the testing of the Colt 1911 by the Army Ordnance Department
A torture test was conducted on March 3rd, 1911. The test consisted of having each gun fire 6000 rounds. One hundred shots would be fired and the pistol would be allowed to cool for 5 minutes. After every 1000 rounds, the pistol would be cleaned and oiled. After firing those 6000 rounds, the pistol would be tested with deformed cartridges; some seated too deeply, some not seated enough, etc. The gun would then be rusted in acid or submerged in sand and mud and some more tests would then be conducted. Browning's pistols passed the whole test series with flying colors. It was the first firearm to undergo such a test, firing continuously 6000 cartridges, a record broken only in 1917 when Browning's recoil-operated machine gun fired a 40000 rounds test.
My point here is that the 1911 is a reliable pistol of choice for many that carry for a living, and have a choice. Many of the Spec Ops and LEO Tactical Depts(SWAT) are going back to the 1911. This is being done due to the inherent shootablity (is that a word) of the 1911 in skilled hands.
Now all that being said, all the pistols mention in this thread are fine SD/ carry weapons. But it should be pointed out that even the Glocks do occasionally have problems. Checkout Glocktalk.com to learn about the Glocks. I have a Glock 25 that is finicky about overall cartridge length.
It depends on what pistol fits you ergonomically and price wise. Any weapon for SD work must fit the shooter. And by the same token the shooter must be comfortable with the pistol. Competent instruction goes along way toward confidence and competence on the shooters part.
Ok, now before you Glock guys line up to lynch me for heresy, I own 4 Glocks, but I own a bunch more 1911s. Guess which one I prefer
Now yall quit pickin on the 1911 and 45acp.
Steve
Hey that was post 501