Lots of sound advice here :thumbup:
...a tiny 15-20° micro-bevel will make the 10° edge stronger, with no real apparent loss of sharpness...
Gaston makes an excellent point, but there is a challenge to it. Survive! Knives are built more for durability that includes cutting into hard/tough materials, with edge-shoulder thickness (where primary-bevel meets edge-bevel) > 0.020", ~20 dps to the apex. That is an edge built for strength. It will not have the light-use cutting performance of some of the knives tested in Ankerson's thread with edge-thicknesses below 0.010", but it will be able to endure a LOT more lateral stress than those tools.
I've posted this schematic before, but here it is again, the Izula compared has similar edge-geometry to the GSO-line:
The box-cutter (red) has an edge-angle ~8-dps and while it is great for slicing paper, cardboard, carpet, leather, flesh, etc. it collapses against overly hard objects and subjection to stronger lateral forces. The knife below it (yellow) is sharpened to 15-20 dps in front of a 3-4 dps primary grind, and it cuts BETTER than the box-cutter while also sporting a more durable edge. The extra durability provided by a stronger microbevel is not to be under-estimated, and any loss of sharpness in that tiny length of edge up to the apex is unnoticeable, especially since that knife is
thinner than the box-cutter for ~3/16" along the primary. However, that slicing blade is not made for the hard-use expected of a knife like the GSO-5.1! Its meager 0.005" edge-thickness and 3-4 dps primary cannot withstand the lateral stresses expected for a longer, thicker camp-knife. For this reason, the GSO is designed to have approximately the same edge-angle - 15-20 dps - but the thickness behind that edge is much greater (> 64X stronger).
To take the edge down to 10-dps would require removing quite a bit of metal from the edge-shoulder on each side. Would this improve cutting performance? Absolutely! But it
might compromise durability, depending on your use of it (e.g. have you ever chipped out a large section of blade on another knife of similar design?).
My advice would be to push the knife in your own use of it with the edge-geometry as it is. If you find yourself desiring higher cutting performance without having experienced poor durability, then definitely try cutting down the edge-shoulders at ~10-dps without touching the apex of the blade. You are thus adding an intermediary bevel to the edge, improving cutting performance without affecting edge-durability, only making it slightly weaker some distance back from the edge. Most users will find such a modification only advantageous.
For example, here is a knife from another company that i cut the edge-shoulders down to <0.010 as it is intended for skinning and not rough-use, but i kept the edge at 15-20 dps:
The electric worksharp or a 1x30 will help you accomplish this more quickly and add a natural curvature to the shoulder, but there are risks as such power-tools can remove a lot of metal more quickly than you might desire and also generate more heat than might be advised. If it's what you have, try it, but take precautions. A large diamond plate like what chambelona59 presented can work wonders at the right grit-levels but will take more time. *shrug* There are also vendors on BF that will do the work for you (e.g.
http://www.bladeforums.com/forums/s...pening-Regrind-Cerakote-Service-(pic-heavy!!))
Survive! Knives are built to be tough, but don't be afraid to adjust them to suit your personal needs :thumbup: You might be surprised at what they can handle.