But all I have to work with is the Sharpmaker.
You can buy a cheap stone at a hardware store for $2 which will be much faster for changing angles. If you are seriously interested in maximizing the ability of your knives then you should really invest in one.
Could I somehow use the 30 degree setting and then the 40?
Yes, it will take awhile to reduce the angle though on the Sharpmaker, like an hour or so.
Could it possibly be dexter causing the burr (no offense dexter)?
Properly hardened, that steel is designed to not form deformation burrs. I do not even use burr removal or minimization techniques on that class of steel when I sharpen them. The techniques I noted in the above to minimize burrs should not be necessary on 13C26. If they are then there is an issue with the steel.
How do you explain the lack of consistent complaints about burr's?
Lack of consistent heat treatment / production sharpening.
i havent found a knife yet, other than pakistan junk that i couldnt sharpen.
Have you worked with ceramic blades?
To be precise, it seems Cliff didn't discredit the steel ...
I have been advocating low carbide and high hardness steels for thin edges with high polishes for about ten years. This is not a new area of discussion nor something that centers around Kershaw. What I have pointed out in their use of the steel specifically was that given the geometry and hardness they are using, they would be better off with 12C27M as it is tougher, easier to grind, more corrosion resistant and cheaper. Though as an aside, given the thick/obtuse edges, you might as well use a high carbide steel anyway because the geometry is inherently stable, so use 440C or similar.
12C27M is a superior rough use knife steel, 13C26 is designed to excel in very thin edged knives, < 0.010":10 degrees. This arguement is also not specific to those steels but deals with general class properties. The same would be said for example with 1095 at 58/59 HRC, the S series steels, or simply 1055 at that hardness would be a more optimal choice for much the same reasons, aside from the corrosion resistance issue.
As a general rule, you are always better off switching steels than underhardening a steel. When you underharden you tend to lose corrosion resistance, aggregate carbides, enlarge the grain structure, basically make everything worse. You will get much better properties with a steel designed to run at that hardness. You can see the spec sheets for the Sandvik steels on the blade materials page on the website.
Hopefully Spyderco will put out a series of blades in those steels, 12C27M and 13C26 and really show the optimal performance. They would make a nice bushcraft pair, small parang (maybe hatchet) and precision whittler. They would also be a nice set of test materials for the mules they are preparing, if so they could include 19C27 as well. Those would make an interesting set to work with.
-Cliff