This comment wasn’t directed at me but I’ll respond anyway. What’s wrong with using a forge? I heat treat with coal and get great results. I test my blades before handing them off to customers so I’m not selling junk even though the blade wasn’t heat treated in a $2500 dollar kiln. I could buy an oven if I wanted to but why fix something if it isn’t broken?
Well, because it's the austenitizing temperatures that are controlling the majority of the mechanical properties of the steel, not just the temper which gets all the glory for "muh toughness" and "muh hardness"
It is oversimplified by folks that the tempering tempetures and rockwell hardness are controlling all the mechanical properties and that all folks are doing during the heat up before quench (austenitizing) are avoiding grain growth.
This is incorrect.
For a steel like 52100 and 1095 that have high amounts of carbon with simple iron carbides it's very easy to dissolve too much carbon or not enough carbon to get the ideal properties.
Or not fully austenitize the 52100 which needs more soak time than 1095
We'll look at Dr Verhoevens work in his book
"Metallurgy of Steel for Bladesmiths & Others
who Heat Treat and Forge Steel" 2005
Steel Metallurgy for the Non-Metallurgist [J. D. Verhoeven] on Amazon.com. *FREE* shipping on qualifying offers. Steel Metallurgy for the Non-Metallurgist
www.amazon.com
First,
There are different types of martensite that are formed based on how much carbon is dissolved into the Austenite when heating before quench.
Lath Martensite and more brittle Plate Martensite
Also too much carbon in solution leads to a high volume of austenite that is retained after quenching which didn't convert to martensite. (Retained Austenite/RA)
Meaning, you can a knife that's both soft and brittle from putting too much carbon in solution.
So, carbon control is key and it's controlled by time and temperature.
Plate Martensite is slightly harder, but during its formation can form cracks in the martensite.
There is no real big increase in hardness putting more than 0.6%wt carbon in solution. (At least not anything worth the tradeoffs described above)
Leftover carbon thats not in solution is in the Carbides promoting wear and strength.
.
Another diagram showing the hardness curves of carbon % wt in solution.
The effect of retained austenite, it is hidden from HRC testing, at the same HRC, higher %RA reduced yield strength meaning that two knives at the same HRC, the higher RA blade will roll at the edge and bend plastically easier.
Meaning lower edge stability at same hardness.
(Also the RA can convert under stress to brittle untempered martensite in the blade)
RA=Bad
(Diagram from Knifesteelnerds
https://knifesteelnerds.com/2018/11/12/rockwell-hardness/)
The simple high carbon steels like 1095 and 52100, it should be avoided putting too much carbon in solution which is very easy to do especially without temperature control.
Diagram showing hardness dropping as more carbide is dissolved putting more carbon in solution and making more retained austenite after quenching.
Meaning the blade will be soft and brittle regardless of how it's tempered after.
High carbon simple steels need to be Austenitized in the two phase region between A1 and Acm. The iron carbon phase diagram below showing visual representation of what the "two phase region" is from the graph above.
(This Diagram shows carbides in grain boundaries but more accurately and pertinent to knives we see finely dispersed spheres of carbides.)
Blue line added to show the desired austenitizing range for 1095 type steel the "sweet spot" is a point on that blue line, the goal is not to dissolve all the carbides. Which means temperature control is king
*This is different than lower carbon steels (on the left in diagram) which need to be fully austenitized to single phase so that no ferrite is left over.
More detailed diagram showing the fine spherodal carbides in the austenite grains. When the austenite is quenched and transformed to martensite and tempered these small sphere like carbides will still remain and will promote more strength and wear resistance. Each little carbide in a simple steel like 1095 is in the range of ~70hrc
Diagram showing the need for a longer soak time for 52100 over a plain carbon steel with similar carbon content at the same temperature to get the same amount of carbon %wt in solution with the austenite due to the effects of the chromium alloy added to 52100.
Conclusion of why you shouldn't HT in a forge.
1.Not able to control time and temperature effectively
*Meaning not able to produce most desirable mechanical properties of a low plate martensite, low retained austinite and fully austenitized microstructure with a nice balance of primary carbides as described above.
2. Less repeatability, more variation in results meaning success can be more by accident.
Meaning problems may occur with lower performance that may not be the fault of the steel, problems will be difficult to rule out as the steel itself due to scatter in temperatures used. For instance if Person A says "1095 is too brittle" and is using a forge with no temperature control need to rule out operator error due to bad control.
3. Steel not unlocked to full potential.
Meaning it will be the name of the steel but not what it's truly capable of in performance. If passionate about higher performance more control is need then eyeballing in a forge.
4. A Magnet is not a substitute for temperature control.
The "curie point" (break down of Magnet domains) is not the same as the "Ac1"(austenite formation during heating) on the iron carbon phase diagram. Also, given that carbon has to be even more carefully controlled for higher carbon steels
The old saying of "go a little past non magnetic" isn't going to work consistently for best results.
Steels like 52100 and 1095 have a sweet spot in the two phase region between A1 and Acm meaning without temperature and time control there's no control over the details that are really controlling mechanical features that give the best performance.
Many knifemakers heat treat with nothing but a forge and a magnet. Is that reliable? What does it mean when the steel is no longer magnetic?
knifesteelnerds.com
Also, this book is easier to get more understanding of these complex topics than Dr Verhoevens, yet also has some details and useful reference tables that can be used real world. Both excellent books, they feed each other and make the brain "buzz"
Knife Engineering: Steel, Heat Treating, and Geometry [Thomas, Dr. Larrin] on Amazon.com. *FREE* shipping on qualifying offers. Knife Engineering: Steel, Heat Treating, and Geometry
www.amazon.com