Shop Prices? Possible visit to NEPAL!

Status
Not open for further replies.
Joined
Apr 10, 2006
Messages
193
What are the prices in the Shop in U$D for Kukris?
I am looking at a AK, Gangaram, Suripate, maybe a Crowfoot.

The Kathmandu Shop.

I am looking at visiting The Kathmandu Shop and want to bring back some GIFTS.

What are the legalities of bringing back say 5 kukris?
 
Write Yangdu, or maybe she'll see this. (She's real busy and might not.) It's a interesting question. I'm not aware of anyone personally who has visited the shop in Nepal and purchased a khuk.

I don't know the legalities and wonder if anyone truly does. There is a bribe system that varies in Nepal. If and when you deal with government or 'official' parties there, keep it in mind. Yangdu and others pay coming and going.


munk
 
Are bribes tax deductable? I'd like to see an itemized return submitted to the IRS with that on it.


munk
 
I don't know where I read this but seems like I read somewhere on here or the site that they don't allow visitors, but maybe that has changed.
 
Azsoldier; write Yangdu.

I think you're correct, Hollow, I just didn't want to discourage a customer.

Yangdu is the only one knowing the answer and her business. Hope it all works out,



munk
 
Yangdu and I talked and she wanted me to answer this question. She's hoping I can answer it gracefully and to everyone's satisfaction. I'm trying to remember when I ever stood for sedate satisfaction, but I'll try.

The Shop in Nepal during peaceful times is not a retail outlet. They aren't set up for it, and the Kamis and staff wouldn't know what to do if a customer appeared on the doorstep. But these aren't peaceful times. The political turmoil, the fueding factions seeking power in the country, and mostly the Maoist Terrorists make travel there dangerous. And it's worse than that; if a well intentioned and kind forumite showed up at the Shop, the Maoists would take note. Even if they didn't outright jeapordize the life of the visitor, which they could do, later on repercussions could be catostrophic.

Imagine if the Terrorists burned down the shop in retaliation for its capitalism, its success. Imagine the Kamis being killed or tortured. They are trying very hard to protect the low profile they've fortunately maintained.

Anyone who is in-Country:- don't visit the shop. For your safety, for the safety of the Kamis, and the future of HI.


I scared myself writing this. It could get bad there.


thanks,
munk
 
Sh1T! i'm military, I didn't even think! FUNK! I'm sorry for even asking. Damn. How could I FORGET about the MAOISTS! Maybe I'm going there in a military capacity? Who knows I don't. Tell her not to worry.
 
Damn. I didn't even think. I feel bad. Thats the LAST THING I WOULD EVER WANT. You know how tired I would be after killing 10,000 Maoists if they did that?
 
Azsoldier said:
Damn. I didn't even think. I feel bad. Thats the LAST THING I WOULD EVER WANT. You know how tired I would be after killing 10,000 Maoists if they did that?

Have at em.
 
I really think you'd need a baker's dozen to earn a khuk... I like the way you used the word 'funk'; there are some kids that read this forum and that's appreciated over the authentic folk word.

Until you asked I hadn't thought about it either. The kamis not too long ago spent several days inside, not wanting to venture out, for fear of drawing attention. People stuck in their houses afraid to go outside for fear their 'liberators' will hurt them.

How do you liberate a country terrorizing the populace? You can't even pretend to be a maoist and do that.

munk
 
Unfortunatley, Unless there is a popular revolt against these bastards, they will win. The only person who had the GUTZ to do anything about it has been nuetered (The King) after being SUPPRESSED by the Int'l community. The Int'l community would not send ammo, arms or support until the king restored government. When he did, THEY FUNKED HIM! The OTHER commies, in parliment, are possibly in colusion with the CPN-M and once they get a 51% majority, BOOM! Just like in starwars! Prachanda declares himself Emporer High Grand PooBah, disbands parliment, shoots everyone that is not a communist.
Sucks to be non american.

This Sh1t would never happen here. I have 2 rifles and a handgun to GARUNTEE it.
 
munk said:
You can't even pretend to be a maoist and do that. munk

Funny, I thought that was exactly how Mao himself did it. Lies, deceit, and terror. Please correct me if I am wrong.


The king was all balls and no backing. Americans would never have supported anyone taking his actions either. Then again we would never allow some "maoists" to terrorize us either. They'd have to die, just the same as that king would have, I'm with you there.

And please, with the language. Not long ago even aluding to that "folk" word too closely was frowned upon by one of our most esteemed moderators (to me especially). Lets keep our standards as high as he and his great predecessors intended them to be, please. JMHO, YMMV.

"Sucks to be non American." Hell yes!!!! This simple phrase speaks volumes to me. (I, like you and a patriotic nationalist to the point of disregarding courtesy and grace much of the time. With no apology for it I may add.) What seperates America is that we stood on our feet and fought for what we have. Ninety percent of the problem spots around the globe didn't. Thats the real difference. We fought off the Brits, and they didn't have the guts.

Smoke sent for Nepal. Namaste.
 
There is a difference between a man, and the school of thought he started. Also, there is quite a difference between what Mao started as, and what he ended as.

You're thinking of the Mao we ended up with, not the one that began the movement.
In the beginning we had Maoists, in the end we had another Chinese dictator.


munk
 
The same can be said of Lenin, and Stalin. No?

Even Hitler didn't start out with terror.

How do you judge these men, their intentions, their sales pitch, or the results?
 
I dunno. But Castro wouldn't be where he is now if he'd been terrorizing the peasents he later led to revolution. So my line, "you can't even pretend to be a Maoist and do that." is still good.

It's the CEO ethic- screw them after you're in power.


munk
 
Dont think guts was the problem Approy.:rolleyes:

You were just 3000 miles away , we didnt have engines then & we already had conquered half the world & re supply was a problem! :D

You also were only usefull for pine, tax & cotton at that time, we had more important economoic strataghies to look after.;)

We probably fought & killed more enemy & lost more men ourselves in just one war than all of Americas wars put together.

At that time you were the equivalent of commie terroists! ;) wanting to get rid of the King etc! Definatly Naughty rebels in fact! Wanting human rights!

Interestingly My local museum still has George Washingtons bible though.


war trophy

Good you have joined in, in WW1 in the end though.{& WW2 off course.};)


With Peace & respect.

Spiral
 
That was strange, wasn't it, dragging the English King into this? I don't think history does credit him with a lot of the famed english 'guts', but that isn't why you lost the colonies, you're right, Spiral.
If you look at it, England lost almost every single 'colony'. In the end, not about economics or supply chains, but inevitable freedom.


munk
 
Respectfully, you missed my point, Spiral. Guts was the problem for the arabs, Indians, and other non-American colonists. I wasn't implying the Brits were gutless, historically, quite the opposite I believe. (We still wopped your butts though! He He.) Oppressive, impearalistic, dictatorial, selfish and fascist, yes, but gutless, no. I was talking about the other British colonies such as the sandy places, etc. We werent an economic match for England either, as per your examples. Pure grit won our "human rights." And we were never anything like "commie terroists." At least not anything like the idiots in Nepal, Russia, China, or N. Korea, etc. That may have been the nationalistic British opinion of our revolution, but we didn't ever kill off the British loyalists or terrorize their familys. That is a misstatement. The British, however, used the loyalists information to commit atroscities, and terrorize the revolutionaries and their families quite often, however.

Munk, you don't think Castro terrorizes his people and rules as a dictator? Move to Miami and listen to the opinions of the Cubans.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top