munk said:That was strange, wasn't it, dragging the English King into this? I don't think history does credit him with a lot of the famed english 'guts', but that isn't why you lost the colonies, you're right, Spiral.
If you look at it, England lost almost every single 'colony'. In the end, not about economics or supply chains, but inevitable freedom.
munk
nahrr it was all about economic control and in the end the britts lost ... and the yanks took over,, but in a more .. subvercive "international" fashion

all the european nations lost there colonies,,, the french cling onto some in the pacific... but theyer not much ,,, englnad dosnt even control england anymore

globalisation my dear fellow..
dont get me sarted on the american "revolution"
