
Hi,
I'm relatively new to knife collecting and looking into getting a large bowie and was wondering what everyones impression of these two different knives are. They are both well known makers and I'm pretty sure alot of you are very familiar with them.
The Ruana is listed as:
33 B-Classic Bowie
Blade:14
Blade Material: High carbon steel that is hammer forged, 3/8 stock, with parry strip.
Handle: 5 3⁄4; brass guard, elk antler with brass rivet and recessed brass butt cap.
Comes with a Standard Bowie Sheath.
Price: $1,680
The Gil Hibben bowie:
Alamo Bowie.
Blade:13 3/4" by 1/4" thick.
Blade Material: Mirror polished 440C stainless steel
Handle: brass guard, brass blade catcher, and a Macassar Ebony handle. The guard is stamped with the lone star of Texas and Jim Bowie's initials.19 3/4 inches in overall length including it's 13 3/4 inch long by 1/4 inch thick blade.
Comes with antique brown handcrafted leather sheath topped with a star medallion.
Price: $1,550.00
I'm just really curious to see which blade you like better, even though "like" can mean different things to different people. Maybe some thoughts about the collectability of these knives, overall impressions of the makers, knife construction quality. Would you definitley prefer one over the other?
Anyway, any thoughts or comments would be of great interest. If you had any suggestions about other large bowie makers that would be great too.
Thanks.