- Joined
- Sep 14, 2006
- Messages
- 4,409
Andy, I'm 57, and have been in wild places most of my life (including a 22 year career in Special Operations). I've lived and worked in Central and South America, Africa and the Middle East...and of course here in the good ol' USA! I know what the odds are of these things occuring, but statistics are based on trend analysis, which takes into account everything, everywhere. My point is that you can't dismiss something just because the "odds" are against it. Better safe than sorry is a good motto when it comes to something like this. One doesn't need to be paranoid, but also not to go blissfully around thinking it will never happen here, to me or mine.
Best Regards,
Ron
All true. As a parallel example, I have some relatives who are so paralyzed by fear that their children could be kidnapped or molested by pedophiles that they won't even take them to the park. This is an example of recognizing a legitimate danger, but reacting to it completely out of proportion to the risk, especially since the chance that someone will come up and kidnap a child who is in a public place being watched by a parent is very very slim.
So, I hear what you are saying, but folks who may be new to the idea of having wildlife in the area or who may be new to living in the country may over react to that fact if they don't have any real knowledge of the actual risks.
For hundreds of years people have killed off predators and other wildlife just on the principle that such animals might somewhere, someday, be a danger to life or livestock.
While coyotes and other animals have in some places become a nuisance, and in very very rare circumstances a danger, the fact is that millions of these animals live amongst millions of humans, passing each other by mostly unseen, without any negative interaction whatsoever.
So, while there is a vanishingly small chance that a child could be harmed by a wild animal, far more emphasis should be placed on keeping them safe from much more common dangers, and IMO, no one should take the step of killing off animals which may be sighted in the area just on the off chance that something may occur, without observing real danger signals like an animal being too bold and approaching an inhabited dwelling in the daytime, or acting as if it is sick. Then some culling may be in order. Otherwise, enjoy the wildlife sightings and encourage your children to do the same.

Andy