Well, it's just my approach to making a chef's knife. There are many makers that do really,
really thin knives, but I like to make them feel heftier. A lot of Japanese knives (and my ideal performance standards are based off the Japanese knife) are hidden tang with a really skinny, narrow tang. On top of that, they usually use a really light wood like ho. The Kato, for example; I tried it out a few months back and this is a serious workhorse. 0.200" thick at the spine with a substantial taper and a full convex grind. Knives like that don't feel cumbersome to me, they just feel great. You'd imagine that it has trouble cutting through a lot of food, but comparing it to other knives it wedged on potatoes less. Thin knives even have a tendency to drag a lot, so even if they have the capability to cut slivers, they're slowed down by how much surface area is in contact with the food (then with the light knife,
you have to do the work).
I played drums for many years and an analogy that clicks for me is that the drumstick does all of the work for me; I'm barely using some wrist and finger movement. I like my knives to feel similar in that aspect.
It's really difficult to try to get that same kind of feel and balance with a full tang and the materials we often see here (phenolics, composites, heavier woods). I did some SolidWorks models and it's possible to end up with the same weight with some serious metal removal (would have to be lasered/watered/edm/etc); I'll have to play around with the FEA more to make sure it isn't floppy like crazy though. Here's a really early thing I was messing around with. They're both the same weight. The FEA here doesn't really tell me much though since there's the rest of the handle that's unaccounted for. When I come up with actual iterations then I'd do direct comparisons to what I have been doing (simple holes drilled).
I hope that's what you were asking about

Lemme know if I missed the mark completely.