Skinny ASH-1 Vid

For easier viewing pleasure :D
[youtube]eaMeBkmqWCE[/youtube]
[youtube]4-YSUgs4Ud8[/youtube]
 
Thanks for posting those. How did the edge hold up after the firesteel scraping. I haven't tried the blade edge for that (yet).
 
230grains said:
From experience, it dulls it.

I like using a scraper.
Click to expand...

Me either, however, I haven't tried using INFI either. I keep a dedicated striker but with the rounded spine of the NMFBM it wouldn't work IF I ever needed to use it. I doubt I ever would NEED it, thought it's good to know what's coming in advance.
 
That's one reason I'm not a fan of the rounded spine on NM knives. Give me my sharp edges back!
 
Thanks for the comments guys.

The edge didnt even notice the wood but the metal match did dull that spot. The ceramic side of the DC3 i carry in my kit got the edge back in a few swipes.

Im with you guys, I dont like to use the edge but the spine is rounded on the Skinny, really the only thing I dont like about it.
 
Very informative and cool video's, That Skinny Ash worked pretty well. Thanks for sharing, :thumbup:
 
Nice videos! Those one-handed skills are great to know you have if ever needed. Thanks for posting these. :thumbup:

Oh, and that's a mighty fine looking Skinny ASH you've got there, too. :D
 
Marvin,

the Skinny ASH1's were 0.1875" thick.

The ASH1LE was 0.225" thick.

The ASH1CG and HOGASH1's were 0.32" thick
 
230grains said:
That's one reason I'm not a fan of the rounded spine on NM knives. Give me my sharp edges back!
Click to expand...

Any particular reason for wanting the squared edge over the round one? The only one I could come up with was for fire steel use.
Edit: never mind, just watched the video above. I agree. :)
 
Last edited:
Wayfinder. Great videos. Thanks for posting.



230grains said:
That's one reason I'm not a fan of the rounded spine on NM knives. Give me my sharp edges back!
Click to expand...


To each their own, but for "Knife" use, I way prefer the rounded spine. :thumbup:

The "One-Handed" fire starting method is nifty and all and I guess it requires something like a knife with a squared spine or edge to be used. But, I will just probably have to assume I will have use of both of my hands and I think I will stick to prioritizing a knifes spine for "comfort function". I don't use my knife as a striker. I don't "expect" I will need to. So, I have no need or want for a sharp spine.

I know a LOT of guys want to use their knife spines as a striker for ferro sticks, but if you are going to bother carrying a ferro stick, why not a little dedicated styker. There are MANY dirt CHEAP and light-weight options.

You can find little dedicated strikers for about a buck or two.

striker-steel.jpg



I haven't tried yet, but I always thought one of the "tungsten Carbide" Sawzall blade for cutting tile and such would make a great ferro striker:

Sawzall-TungstenCarbide.jpg


The Tungsten carbide "Teeth" should create a ton of sparks and last a long time. :thumbup:

A Sawzall blade already has a hole that you could run a lanyard through, you could grind off the little tab point and then grind the whole thing to the size and shape you like:

Sawzall-TungstenCarbidecutdowntape.jpg


..... or similar..... Put a little bit of Electrical tape on the handle area (optional - if you like) and done.

Or just simply grind the back of an OLD sawzall blade at a sharp 90... whatever.

Or look into a "Blast Match" with integrated striker, etc. etc.

Maybe just me, but ANYTHING other than unnecessarily bunging up my knife.

I would personally rather have my knife left "Optimized" for "KNIFE" use. :thumbup:

Using blade "edges" as a striker is silly to me. Sorry. I wouldn't used my blades edge unless I absolutely had no other option. The ferro rods DO dull the edges and while it may not hurt the steel much, now you have a dull edge "In the Field" and have to spend that much more time sharpening at some time or another when you could have just used a CHEAP and EASY to carry striker... But, that is just my opinion. Obviously, many seem dead set to bung up their knives and feel carrying a "0.5" ounce striker to be a hassle or something (????).

I have used a few various Ferro rods. They work. I have tried/done and know how to use a few different "emergency/survival fire options to create fire "IF" and when needed. But, I don't view every fire as another need to test my survival fire skills. Let alone another opportunity to unnecessarily bung up my knife.

Call me lazy I guess, but I typically just take the easy path on some of this stuff. I always seem to have a small torch lighter of some sort. It works without bunging up my knife as well. :o

I use "TOOLS" a lot. There is a common saying for those who like and use tools: "Right tool for the job". ;)


While the Busse Nuclear Meltdown is pretty good with me, I actually have a slight preference for my spines and even choils to be just slightly convexed with radiused corners - like in the lower left:

RadiusedBevelsonKnifeSpinesChoils.jpg



But, I don't mind the Nuclear Meltdown either.

.
 
Last edited:
DWRW...

In the video above, it's what works for one-handed use. Striker and rod usually require two hands.
 
Marvin8 said:
DWRW...

In the video above, it's what works for one-handed use. Striker and rod usually require two hands.
Click to expand...



Yeah.... I understand why Wayfinder used his knife and why he had to use the edge for the "One-Handed" demonstration. And I get that he showed this demonstration for the "What If" you only had use of one hand for some reason.

I had actually typed an acknowledgement in my first post - understanding his reasoning for the one-handed use. But, I clicked the "undo" button for something else that errased more than I realized.

I also saw that he actually has a dedicated striker attached to his ferro rod - which I "assume" he normally uses. Although, with him "apparently" carrying a dedicated striker, I am not sure I understand why he prefers his knife to have a square sharp spine..... other than just preferring to be "prepared" for needing a one-handed striker option over having a knife with a more comfortable spine. :confused:


My point is just that "I" would rather "assume" I will typically have use of both hands AND rather have my knife optimized for knife use and comfort and KEPT optimized for knife use and comfort, as opposed to modifying my knife to be used for a striker or wishing my knife were able to be used as a striker.

But, to each their own. I am not trying to argue about it. Obviously, everyone has their own preferences and opinions and obviously many of those preferences and opinions are going to be different.

I was just voicing "my" preferences, opinions and why.


An option that might be good for those who want BOTH the option to use their knife spine as a striker and have a rounded spine for comfort might be to flatten/square the spine about mid-way on the spine (?????)... If it is a user and someone is THAT set on being prepared for worst case scenarios, then having somewhat goofy looking spine transitions is more about covering as many options/scenarios as possible - as opposed to knife aesthetics.


I guess some might see my comments as Pooping on Wayfinders "One-Handed" methods, video and some peoples preferences for Spines able to be used for striking ferro rods.
That is not my intention. Again, to each their own. I understand some want things differently or want to be prepared differently.
However, I am just pointing out "my" preferences and "why" I still prefer rounded spines and keeping my knife optimized for knife uses. And I will just take my chances and "assume" I won't break my arm/hand. I will keep my (one-handed) torch lighter around for that if needed. ;) - And use a dedicated striker - for the times when and if I need a ferro rod and have BOTH hands. :thumbup:

.
 
Last edited:
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top