- Joined
- Apr 19, 2005
- Messages
- 5,533
I get over in the Traditional forum and see all the well finished, nice scaled and highest quality steel slipjoints from other companies and I yearn for a top level Buck slipjoint. One that you would give as a special gift or you would buy for yourself because you could.
They were telling some beginner the best quality stockman to get for his first slipjoint and all I had to offer was Dymondwood or black "plastic".
I remembered the 303 Waterbuffalo scale is still being sold so I through my 2 cents in and showed a photo of it.
After doing that I decided life was too short to not frequently carry a high quality pocketknife, so I got me another 303 Buff.
Well, when it arrived the differences in finsih from my first made me have a critical look at both and consider the problems as they related to my want and desire to have a Buck equal to any of the 'fancy' stockmen in the Traditional Forum.
Here are three photos and my critical review of them in my "state-of-wanting".
Looks pretty good but look at the difference in the polished area above the bevel grind and also noticed the nail nics are different sized. On a limited edition knife I would hope for more polish on most surfaces. Yes, it costs more but we are not paying 5 and dime prices for these limited editions.
Here's the reverse, noticed that the partial jigging spots had bolster edges rounded off in the depression. I think I would like mine sharp with scale thick enough it could be polished down to bolster level. The partial jigged areas next to the bolster were "messed up" by the bolster polishing. Notice difference in nail nic size. Front scales look better in both knives ?
Photo of bottom view. Yes there is variance in natural materials, but I would want my scale thick enough that it could be buffed down on ends so that no jigged depression were against bolster edge.
Are these differences being picky when your don't like them? Is the edge too toothy?
Well, I throw this around because several times in various threads the want by not only me but others for a really nice stockman that looks like granddads knife has been voiced.
I promoted the 303 to the new person on the Traditionals Forum and now I wish I could have been just a little morre assured that if he got one he would have been happy.
I will set the thick scale buff back and EDC the thin scale. Will polish up the toothy edges on the blades and put some Flitz on a piece of leather and polish up the grind marks on the bevels.
We Buck Nuts believe in the company, I just want a slipjoint that as good as any one elses and can sit beside the fanciest 110 and hold it's head up high.
Am I damned for being critical I hope not, it was just my personal experience and my continued yearning for knife I could feel rich carrying........300bucks
They were telling some beginner the best quality stockman to get for his first slipjoint and all I had to offer was Dymondwood or black "plastic".
I remembered the 303 Waterbuffalo scale is still being sold so I through my 2 cents in and showed a photo of it.
After doing that I decided life was too short to not frequently carry a high quality pocketknife, so I got me another 303 Buff.
Well, when it arrived the differences in finsih from my first made me have a critical look at both and consider the problems as they related to my want and desire to have a Buck equal to any of the 'fancy' stockmen in the Traditional Forum.
Here are three photos and my critical review of them in my "state-of-wanting".

Looks pretty good but look at the difference in the polished area above the bevel grind and also noticed the nail nics are different sized. On a limited edition knife I would hope for more polish on most surfaces. Yes, it costs more but we are not paying 5 and dime prices for these limited editions.

Here's the reverse, noticed that the partial jigging spots had bolster edges rounded off in the depression. I think I would like mine sharp with scale thick enough it could be polished down to bolster level. The partial jigged areas next to the bolster were "messed up" by the bolster polishing. Notice difference in nail nic size. Front scales look better in both knives ?

Photo of bottom view. Yes there is variance in natural materials, but I would want my scale thick enough that it could be buffed down on ends so that no jigged depression were against bolster edge.


Are these differences being picky when your don't like them? Is the edge too toothy?
Well, I throw this around because several times in various threads the want by not only me but others for a really nice stockman that looks like granddads knife has been voiced.
I promoted the 303 to the new person on the Traditionals Forum and now I wish I could have been just a little morre assured that if he got one he would have been happy.
I will set the thick scale buff back and EDC the thin scale. Will polish up the toothy edges on the blades and put some Flitz on a piece of leather and polish up the grind marks on the bevels.
We Buck Nuts believe in the company, I just want a slipjoint that as good as any one elses and can sit beside the fanciest 110 and hold it's head up high.
Am I damned for being critical I hope not, it was just my personal experience and my continued yearning for knife I could feel rich carrying........300bucks
Last edited: