harder to make? Which folder is more of a challenge or are they about equal? Thanks for the input.
I personally feel that each style of folder presents
different and unique challenges. I will preface this by saying I have not made liner or frame locks at this point but have studied their design and tooling required. I can imagine that the lock face/angle and placement of the detent in a liner lock requires great skill and care. But any more skill than fitting a slipjoint blade tang so that the blade has the right amount of spring tension but also that the spring is flush with the spine of the knife in open/halfstop/closed position?
I have seen frame locks built with nothing more than a dremel tool/cut off wheel, drill press and assorted hand tools. Same with slipjoints. On the flip side I use tooling plates, fixtures, rotary table/milling machine/surface grinder when I build a slipjoint. I think you get the idea.
While it is true a slipjoint can be made with a removable barrel pivot most collectors or buyers of highend slipjoints will want traditional assembly methods. This means peening pins, including the blade pivot pin. Peening pivot pins IMHO is one of the great skills learned when making slipjoints. Peening a pivot pin can greatly affect the mechanics of the knife. A blade can have side to side play or too tight if not peened perfectly. And on top of this, the pin must disappear in the bolster when finished!
You did mention not only which is harder to make, but which is more of a challenge. When you start adding blades the challenges goes sky high. On many multi-blade slipjoints a single spring must work two blades! To get two tangs that have perfect geometry working on a single spring is something that will put your skills to the test. I have included a couple of pictures of two slipjoints that I have built that should give you an idea of just how hard a slipjoint can be to build.
Bottom line is that you can take either style of knife to great extremes , requiring very refined but different skill sets.