I guess most forumites have probably heard by now that Smith & Wesson, in the midst of battling a series of lawsuits blaming the company for gun violence, is being sold. It's going to be this "back door" approach that ends up destroying the Second Amendment. If nuisance lawsuits force all gun manufacturers and dealers out of business, the amendment loses much of its significance. The irony is that it doesn't matter that a company wins the lawsuits against it, the cost of defensive litigation gets too expensive for the company to survive. A case in point, a few years back a small airplane manufacturer (I forgot which one) was forced out of business because of lawsuits, and yet the company had won every single case it was involved in. I think it's time that this country adopt a legal system such as that used in many other countries: if a person files a lawsuit against someone and loses, he has to pay at least part of the other person's legal fees. This would certainly cut down on the number of frivolous lawsuits, which are presently endangering our freedom and clogging our courts.
What's this got to do with khuks? Everything. Various types of knives are already illegal in many parts of the country, and the way knives may be legally carried vary from place to place. It's just a matter of time before the liberal "do-gooders" and their lawyers, encouraged by their success at shutting down gun manufacturers and dealers, focus on weapons other than guns.
[This message has been edited by Steven F (edited 01-04-2000).]
What's this got to do with khuks? Everything. Various types of knives are already illegal in many parts of the country, and the way knives may be legally carried vary from place to place. It's just a matter of time before the liberal "do-gooders" and their lawyers, encouraged by their success at shutting down gun manufacturers and dealers, focus on weapons other than guns.
[This message has been edited by Steven F (edited 01-04-2000).]