Some Pretty Pictures

Those are great pictures! I am a big fan of landscape photography and was hoping you might be able to shed some light on how you take yours. Do you typically use a tripod and go for longer exposures or is it mostly handheld or a mixture of both? Are there certain lenses you more often use for landscapes? How much post processing goes into the pictures to make some of the colors really pop? Thank you so much for any help you can provide!
 
Mike, those are awesome and beautiful pictures!! It was some time ago since I looked on your website. It remembers me now that I've to look more often:D

I hope, one day I can take pictures like this.

Thanks for sharing!
 
Ahhhh...thanks so much, Mike! Those are absolutely awesome images, and just the perfect way to start my day! I appreciate you, sir!
 
Everyone, thank you, again.

Those are great pictures! I am a big fan of landscape photography and was hoping you might be able to shed some light on how you take yours. Do you typically use a tripod and go for longer exposures or is it mostly handheld or a mixture of both? Are there certain lenses you more often use for landscapes? How much post processing goes into the pictures to make some of the colors really pop? Thank you so much for any help you can provide!

Thank you.

Yes, I use a tripod for the vast majority of my landscape photos – whenever possible.

To begin with, they do tend to produce sharper images than handheld images in bright daylight – particularly if you do as I do, and use a cable release, lock the mirror, weight the tripod, etc.

I also find the slower, more methodical, more considered tendencies of tripod use do lead me to better pictures. I frame my shots more precisely; I often level the shots with a double bubble level; I systematically scan my viewfinder for anything sticking in my composition; I think about which elements I want in my picture and exactly where I should place my tripod to get the elements arranged in my frame as desired; etc.

It's also easier and not as tiring as handholding a heavy camera and lens framed just right, and held to your eye, while waiting (perhaps 5 minutes, perhaps an hour) for the peak moment.

It also aids in lining things up well, when making multiple exposures for HDR (high dynamic range) or for stitched panoramas.


For landscape photography, my most commonly used lens is the 24-70mm f/2.8. However, it is not particularly uncommon for me to use lenses anywhere from 15mm to 1,200mm for my landscapes.


My post-processing tends to be very light. In fact, after initial processing of the picture, in most cases I do no post-processing. However, in the processing stage, I usually do hypersaturate the colors. Bluntly, while I try to follow my artistic sensibilities as possible, I have to face the realities of being a businessman, and (with a few exceptions that don't apply to me) it is not easily possible to succeed in this business without hypersaturated color. Almost every single buyer (private or corporate, fine art or stock), in almost every single instance, strongly prefers and chooses hypersaturated color. Increasing saturation is a necessity of competitive business.

Also, increased saturation has a relationship with increased contrast. I like most of my pictures to be rather contrasty; it emphasizes certain kinds of tonal relationships which I often seek, in my picture making.
 
Bryan,

I have to warn you that I think that most of your line of questioning is not likely to prove very productive.

Yes, tools and techniques can make a difference. However, they would be best viewed as necessary, but not sufficient. They are ultimately a trivial part of becoming a photographer. A photographer is less someone who knows how to operate camera gear, and more someone who can wholistically make photographs.

The barriers you need to face, in order to get far, have more to do with vision, meaning, intent, translation, consistency, communication, passion, and stuff like that. I can't tell you exactly what to ask, because it depends a lot on your unique contributions to the medium, but I can tell you that thinking, asking, and learning about this kind of stuff will take you further than tech questions about gear and methods.

I suppose, in the early stages, you need to ask and learn about both, but just keep in mind that the kinds of questions you are asking are the means, but not the ways nor the reasons nor the ends.

I'm not trying to be harsh, just straight with you. I hope this helps.

Mike,

No worries bro. :D I totally understand what you are saying. I feel, rather I hope that I have an eye for photography and am looking into a camera right now. I was curious as to the tools in your arsenal to gather an idea of what lenses I may need to look at in the future for macro and general shooting. I hope to get set up soon and take a day trip down the Seward Highway to get some pics of the small ice falls that form every winter.

I guess what I was thinking was "Okay, I know what I like to shoot, but what's the best things to use to capture them best?". I don't know if I quite have an eye for the outdoors yet, but may be thinking more of the abstract or subject shooting style (I hope that makes sense lol). I don't mean to hijack your thread, but things like this are what I enjoy shooting. Thinking I may want to do b/w photos as well.

I'll drop you an email soon, I hope (I suck at communication most times :o ) as to not draw away from your thread. :thumbup:
 
Evolute, thanks for the info. I am looking to get back into photography again as a hobby so I am always eager to learn different techniques and perspectives from those people (like yourself) who are very skilled at it. Thank you!
 
Absolutely gorgeous. Thank you. It was a pleasure to view those photos. You are truly lucky to have experienced all that you have and truly talented to have captured it so magnificently!
 
Back
Top