Peter Hartwig
Gold Member
- Joined
- Feb 29, 2008
- Messages
- 5,439
If it is spa fresh that should be part of the disclosure. The buyer can then decide if that is what they want or not. Buyer can always ask, but they really shouldn't have to.
Personal opinion, spa treatment devalues a knife.
In most collecting circles a refurbished-refinished product is not the same as original, and has quite an impact on the collectablity of the item
But, a used knife is a used knife - and with some knife collectors, that's a deal breaker in the first place. Once it is no longer "new" it wouldn't seem to matter if the maker resharpened it or whatever. I'd certainly prefer that over getting a dull, dinged up custom - someone else's use of the knife does not give it character or collectibility for me. I personally have no issues if a knife is given spa treatment by the maker. Someone else doing it would be a different story.Personal opinion, spa treatment devalues a knife.
In most collecting circles a refurbished-refinished product is not the same as original, and has quite an impact on the collectablity of the item
I think that's the consensus if it is in fact a collectible or vintage knife. For example, a Garage Era Emerson CQC-6 that is not zero ground, has a buff line, has old hardware, snail trails, a nick in the blade, etc. may very well be more collectible as is to a vintage Emerson collector. To me, not so much. Same applies to a Loveless, or Bob Lum, or Bill Moran (i think I am making my point) - knifemakers who are no longer with us, and whose knives command prices well above even many of the best current custom makers. But someones user Sebenza that they get freshened up (since it's free) before selling seems very reasonable.The general concensous has been that it’s better not to have the spar treatment as far as value is concerned.
As for rare collector pieces, a spa will reduce value as that rare piece is worth more in original condition, even if it’s a couple scuffs.