- Joined
- Jan 22, 2013
- Messages
- 3,003
I know what your going to say- It depends on what I plan on using the knife for. That's the easy answer.
I bring this up because I personally have very mixed feelings about spalting. When a fiddleback is clad in heavy spalting, it is either a scandi or low grind. Unless you hate spalted steel, these are very nice to look at. I'll actually scroll back up a few times to look at, appreciate, and drool over a fiddleback with heavy deep spalting. The older Fiddleback spalted blades bring tears to my eyes.
Convex grinds with heavy spalting usually mean it's a lower grind. That's fine and dandy, but for a guy that uses his blades for cutting and slicing and not so much batoning and splitting, these make for more of a apple and potato splitter than slicer. Did that make sence? The next logical solution is to go with a fuller higher grind with less spalting. When I purchase these high grinds, I'm always happy with the way they perform. But, they don't have the beauty or pop or mojo that the more spalted blades have. This lack of flare usually pushes me to release the fiddleback back into the wild. Sometimes the lower convex grinds can be spaltless. These, IMO, can give off a incomplete look. Aesthetics are very important with a knife purchase, but how important?
I've seen high grind and spaltless Fiddlebacks sit stagnant on the Exchange, Flea Market and Fiddleback Friday. Even the more popular variants like the Bushfinger and Bushcrafter hang out for a bit if they aren't rocking the 3D goodness. I can only assume that I'm not the only one that finds spalting more desirable than the same variant with less or no spalting?
Question:
[scales aside] Which blade below would you buy? Why?
I bring this up because I personally have very mixed feelings about spalting. When a fiddleback is clad in heavy spalting, it is either a scandi or low grind. Unless you hate spalted steel, these are very nice to look at. I'll actually scroll back up a few times to look at, appreciate, and drool over a fiddleback with heavy deep spalting. The older Fiddleback spalted blades bring tears to my eyes.
Convex grinds with heavy spalting usually mean it's a lower grind. That's fine and dandy, but for a guy that uses his blades for cutting and slicing and not so much batoning and splitting, these make for more of a apple and potato splitter than slicer. Did that make sence? The next logical solution is to go with a fuller higher grind with less spalting. When I purchase these high grinds, I'm always happy with the way they perform. But, they don't have the beauty or pop or mojo that the more spalted blades have. This lack of flare usually pushes me to release the fiddleback back into the wild. Sometimes the lower convex grinds can be spaltless. These, IMO, can give off a incomplete look. Aesthetics are very important with a knife purchase, but how important?
I've seen high grind and spaltless Fiddlebacks sit stagnant on the Exchange, Flea Market and Fiddleback Friday. Even the more popular variants like the Bushfinger and Bushcrafter hang out for a bit if they aren't rocking the 3D goodness. I can only assume that I'm not the only one that finds spalting more desirable than the same variant with less or no spalting?
Question:
[scales aside] Which blade below would you buy? Why?
