Spirit of Steel Knife Show: Memo To The Manufacturers

Another thought if they attend.

Canal Street - If they would consider knives with traditional shields, I'll wager I might own at least a dozen of them by now. I truly like most of their patterns, but can't get past the gold coin shield they use to buy even one. I am not the only member who has mentioned this in past discussions.
 
Another thought if they attend.

Canal Street - If they would consider knives with traditional shields, I'll wager I might own at least a dozen of them by now. I truly like most of their patterns, but can't get past the gold coin shield they use to buy even one. I am not the only member who has mentioned this in past discussions.

I dislike it too, Hal. Just could never get cozy with that shield..
 
How about GEC making their new dogleg jack with a spear main blade? The small secondary blade is fine as is, or they could offer a small wharncliffe.

Please ask Queen to offer more 1095 in their regular line, and to grind the primary bevels thinner on the blades (and THEN sharpen them)!

Lastly, speak to Canal Street about designing a more aesthetic shield!

Thanx,
Stevo
 
Another thought if they attend.

Canal Street - If they would consider knives with traditional shields, I'll wager I might own at least a dozen of them by now. I truly like most of their patterns, but can't get past the gold coin shield they use to buy even one. I am not the only member who has mentioned this in past discussions.

100% agreed. I would own several Canal Streets by now if it weren't for that nasty shield. I just can't get past it.
 
Greg, I'd tell 'em to get it right the first time so the folks who buy their knives won't be saddled with the hassle of sending knives back and forth to work out the kinks.
It's good PR for their company and product on the forums and saves money in the long run. (I know this last part is debatable since they may feel that a significant segment may not be bothered to send a knife in.)

I'd also tell them (speaking from my own point of view) that many of us would be willing to pay a few dollars more if they would take the time to get it right. This means sharp blades, quality scales, good fit, finish and action.

If they want customer and brand loyalty, it needs to be earned by addressing these issues and building the best knife they can for the money...not with the least they can offer and still get away with.

Well said, and very true. I know in the Buck s/f just for example (not singling out Buck) , there have constantly been comments when someone asks about a quality issue, to the fact that, Oh well, Buck has great service... Send it in.

Well, they do have great service, but I think thats a terrible way to look at things. Sure there are going to be the ones that slip through, we are all human, but take the time and make it right the first time. How disappointing to get something new, only to find out it has to go back, or just be satisfied with sub par quality. In most instances, we pay the shipping to send the item back, so add on the extra 5 bucks we would spend for shipping, and take an extra few minutes checking the final product.

The sad part is that, all the older guys who took a lot of pride in their job, retired or died. The younger generation doesn't seem to have the same pride.
They just do enough work to keep their job. BUT, there are a lot of people looking for work, so they have a big pool to select from :D


Sorry for the mini rant, the coffee hasn't kicked in yet :mad:
 
Greg, I'd tell 'em to get it right the first time so the folks who buy their knives won't be saddled with the hassle of sending knives back and forth to work out the kinks.
It's good PR for their company and product on the forums and saves money in the long run. (I know this last part is debatable since they may feel that a significant segment may not be bothered to send a knife in.)

I'd also tell them (speaking from my own point of view) that many of us would be willing to pay a few dollars more if they would take the time to get it right. This means sharp blades, quality scales, good fit, finish and action.

If they want customer and brand loyalty, it needs to be earned by addressing these issues and building the best knife they can for the money...not with the least they can offer and still get away with.

that's it! :thumbup:
 
Time for dissent: I, for one, am perfectly happy that GEC puts ogre-grade springs in their knives. If I wanted an easy-open knife, I'd go tactical. I stopped buying slipjoints from other makers precisely for the reason that the springs were insipid. If GEC springs went the way of Case, I'd stop buying them, too.
 
^+1 I like the tough springs too. The oldest GEC that I have owned was a 23 pioneer (2 blade) in Bocote wood -so that is my reference for "tough springs." I wouldn't want them any lighter than they are right now.

-Here is a challenge for the future -Maybe make a TL-29 or a sportsman type knife with tools other than knives -such as a small saw, drill, awl, can-opener, bottle opener, etc. In 1095 that would be awesome (and probably pricy:D). I understand if that is a little beyond possibility for the near future.

-I would like to see more crazy acrylics too. :thumbup:

-You guys don't like the tubes? Hmmm. I wont argue with the traditionalists, but I do like the tubes personally. It just captures that factory smell so well:p.
 
Back
Top