I received my Cat and Chicago today (as well as a blue Manix 2, which is an awesome knife but not the point of this post).
We are talking about a sub-$50 knife with an S30V blade and CF scales, so it's not reasonable to expect perfection in fit and finish. With that in mind, I think these are very nice little knives with a few minor issues. I will discuss them a bit, with the caveat that I am a Sage I owner and it's hard not to compare these knives to that awesome, awesome blade due to their similar construction and Taiwanese manufacture.
First, the good:
- The Cat has typical Spyderco ergonomics - it is easy to open with one hand, and fills the hand really well for such a small knife. The choil and spine are nicely jimped for a secure grip. Spyderco's ergonomics continue to make their small knives the most useful in the industry IMO.
- The S30V blade is quite sharp, if not the sharpest I've ever seen.
- The lockup is quite solid in all directions and the liner lock seems secure and sturdy.
- I love the Spydie wire bayonet clips, and this is no exception.
- The liners, at least on the non-lock side, are drilled out. The knives are not exceptionally light for their small size, but they're not bad either.
- Unlike some Cats/Chicagos I have seen pictures of online, all the bolts are tight with no stripping.
- Blade centering is perfect.
- I like the matte finish hardware and liners as a contrast to the nicely-polished ones on my Sage I.
The not so good:
- The Chicago is just an impractical size IMO. I know it was made to comply with stringent local laws on blade length, but if I'm going to carry such a small knife I might as well carry one that doesn't look threatening in any way, like my Kiwi. The Chicago's construction and design are likely to make it look scary to people who are paranoid about knives. On the flipside, I suppose one could use the Chicago in an emergency defensive role, something the Kiwi couldn't do nearly as well.
- The quality of construction and finish is poor for a non-Byrd Spyderco. In particular, there is some ugly gray residue inside the Spydie hole and on the machining on the sides of the blade that should presumably have been polished out, and the edges of the CF scales have small spots of delamination. I don't want to be unrealistic about finish on such a full-featured knife at this price point, but they did choose to call it a Spyderco and not a Byrd, so they chose to have it held up to that standard.
- The polished CF scales just seem way less practical than the grippier ones on the Sage.
On balance I like the Cat for the money and will keep it. I think the Chicago will probably be going back, though . . .