thombrogan said:
The actual few millimeters where the belt-ground edge shows isn't being mentioned beyond its insanely high level of sharpness.
It tends to overshadow everything else. Most people who I show them to find the opening hole to be ugly at first but after using it for awhile, especially with gloves, it tends to impress most people with the simplicity and functionality.
The only knives that I have seen consistenly critized for their edges were Benchmade, which were in fact fine aesthetically. The cutting performance was however dramatically low as noted by Joe's post on resharpening the Axis to raise its performance.
In contrast how many threads have you seen describing reprofiling a Spyderco Calypso Jr. so it cuts well. There are some makers with extreme viewpoints such as illustrated by this :
who take sharpness, cutting ability and edge retention to a whole different class. You really have to use such a knife to appreciate it, the numbers won't do it justice. Knives like that will make you refine what it means for a knife to be a sharpened prybar. For those curious, they don't look like that starting out :
has the same type of grind, but after sharpening flat to the stone you will see a similar reduction in general aesthetics :
shows the start of such aggressive sharpening. Note the effect on the tip, spine and the general uneven nature of the edge width. In time you will also see a problem develop near the choil as there is no choil notch.
The japanese knives with the hollow ground back reliefs look the same as generally they are left with a fairly coarse finish for slicing work and the scratches hit outside of the relief just as they do in the above. They get very sharp though as the steel is fine graind and hard and the thin edges cut extremely well.
-Cliff