Spyderco Manix or Strider PT

Out of curiousity, would the PT be in the same league as a small Sebenza? I kinda like the size of the PT, for my uses, anyways.
 
If you're trying to compare the Manix with the PT, you'd be disappointed with the PT. Its a MUCH smaller knife than the Manix. The test that was mentioned was between a Manix and an AR/GB I believe, which has an even thicker blade than the PT. I own a Strider GB, and carry it EDC. I also carry a Buck/Mayo 172 for delicate slicing jobs. The GB/ARs just aren't made for slicing. You CAN reprofile them to the point where they'd match a Manix in slicing, but you'd have to thin out the blade a LOT and you'd basically ruin the strong suit of the GB/AR.

As with anything, there's an @$$ for every seat. If you're planning on carrying just one knife, and you don't intend to put any lateral stress on the tip, I think you should get a Manix. Is it better than the PT? Maybe not, but I think it'd be closer to your ideal than the PT. Better to spend a bit over $100 and find out you wanted a Strider, than to spend $300+ on a Strider and find out you wanted a Manix- although with resale you'd be able to buy the manix PLUS a sharpmaker AND a custom leather sheath for it.

I learned this lesson the hard way with a Sebenza. Got one, wasn't wowed, and thought it MUST be me. So, I tried 2 more. Still wasn't wowed. Tried a Buck/Mayo 172 and was honestly wowed. Buy what you like, because the people here will be more than willing to spend YOUR money for you.

I have a GB. I like it for what it is. I have a Buck/Mayo 172 that I like as well- again, for what it is. Let's not bring personalities into this and muddy up the waters.
 
The PT is thicker, doesn't cut as well, and is harder to open and about $100 cheaper then a sebenza. IMO they don't really compare.
 
flipe8 said:
Out of curiousity, would the PT be in the same league as a small Sebenza? I kinda like the size of the PT, for my uses, anyways.

In my opinion, they're in the same league but different divisions. I prefer the looks and blade profile of the PT over the Sebenza, but it depends (as so many things do) on what you're comfortable with. If you're just going to be slicing and what-not with it, then you may prefer the Sebenza. With the Sebenza you also get CRK service, which is very good. With the PT, I find it to be more pocket friendly, and the tip is a tad more stout, though for the size of the knife I'd hope you'd realize not to pry TOO much. The Strider warranty is unconditional (at least once). You may do somethng REALLY dumb with the strider and they'll still fix it- once anyways.

As for me, I've always found the PT to be a bit confusing- kind of like the Buck/Strider 880/1 (The ones inspired by the AR/GB). Its got all the Strider over-engineering built in, but in a package that small do you really NEED it to be that overbuilt? Just a question that I ask myself when I think of the PT.
 
If you happen to be looking for an upscale PT I know of a couple:

mpt1_resize.jpg


pt1.jpg
 
I recommend reading this review made by Cliff Stamp about the manix
http://www.physics.mun.ca/~sstamp/knives/manix.html

I own a manix for more than a year now. I use for all sorts of tasks like; cutting lead, asfalt shingles, wood, food prep, gardening, which includes cutting small branches. It is a very solid knife. For a huge folding knife it behaves like surgians scalpel, thanks to the keen grip and excellent blade geometry.
 
I only use big folders for outside work, and mainly use smaller folders for EDC, except for camping, fishing etc. Work week usually sees me using a Strider PT or Benchmade Sequel. What are you using the knife for? Both are made like tanks, but serve different purposes. The Manix is huge, and was too big for me for outside work, even though I really liked it, and plan on at least trying out a mini Manix. For some the PT is too small. Both are well made knives, and will serve you well. Knife Collector was right though, it is like comparing apples and oranges.
 
I have the Manix and the Mini Manix and I can describe them in one word "FREAKINAWESOME!":D :thumbup:
 
allenC said:
Mick Strider is a jerk, plain and simple.
If you doubt this to be true just do a "search" here on the forums and you'll see for yourself.

That doesn't mean he makes bad knives...don't be subjective, be objective...

all if all, if you have the money and want a stronger knife, the strider is for you.
If not, and want more a daily use knife without as much abuse, go with manix.
 
Quote:
Originally Posted by allenC

Mick Strider is a jerk, plain and simple.
If you doubt this to be true just do a "search" here on the forums and you'll see for yourself.


That doesn't mean he makes bad knives...don't be subjective, be objective...
Hey, if Osama Bin Laden made a great knife would you buy one from him?

I simply refuse to support a jerk like Mick Strider.
But if you want to put money in his pocket, that's your choice.
But you should also know that it tells us alot about yourself as well.

Just my opinion,
Allen.
 
Hold up Sally. First of all, Mick may have lied and people may think he's a jerk, but he's no Osama.

Second, Osama still gets money every time you fill up your tank.

As was said, lets be objective.
 
SpyderJon said:
Hold up Sally. First of all, Mick may have lied and people may think he's a jerk, but he's no Osama.

Second, Osama still gets money every time you fill up your tank.

As was said, lets be objective.
I was not comparing Strider to OBL, I am just pointing out that the "man behind the knife" matters, and you should know who you are supporting.

As for OBL getting paid everytime you fill your tank...this is simply not true.

As for being objective...that's not what I want at all.
You can pick up any knife magazine and get an objective report.
You can read the stats and come away with an objective view.

What I want is subjective opinions.
That's what this forum is all about.
I want to know if you think the Manix or the Strider sucks, and why you feel that way.

Over the years I've come to know alot of you guys.
and I know those who have similar tastes as my own.
So it is of great interests to me to hear the subjective opinions of my fellow forum members.

And my opinion is this:
Even if the Strider was the better knife (which it's not) I would still choose the Spyderco!
 
allenC said:
And my opinion is this:
Even if the Strider was the better knife (which it's not) I would still choose the Spyderco!

Then that's all you needed to say, rather than muddying the waters. You may not have INTENDED to compare MS to OBL, but that is how it read.
 
Okay, allow me to clarify....

Osama is a murdering terrorist.
Mick Strider is a jerk and a first rate A-hole.

Is that better?

Cheers,
Allen.
 
allenC said:
Okay, allow me to clarify....

Osama is a murdering terrorist.
Mick Strider is a jerk and a first rate A-hole.

Is that better?

Cheers,
Allen.


Yes, Allen, that is MUCH better.
 
Back
Top