Definitely not a DIY mod that you can do with a dremel.
What I'd concede is that it's going to result in a smaller remaining cross section, but in terms of stress concetrations the smaller hole has a smaller radius and that is generally worse for what we're referring to, especially if the hole is tapped. Since the cross section of the remaining portion of blade is good enough as shown by most Spyderco knives, I'm not worried about it. And I especially won't be making statements saying that it's not fit for anything other than "minor use" or whatever.
Also the thumb stud hole then has a hardened stud press-fitted into it. That’s a fairly unique stress. I’ve seen more blades develop a crack at the stud than a crack at a Spydiehole.
Absolutely this. Seen a lot of Hinderer ZTs broken this way.
Well of course a well executed stud with a smaller hole, a larger moment of area, and better controlled interference with press fit parts is going to be stronger. I just don't agree that this mod is going to introduce any issues that we don't already know of with Spyderco folders (like that they are strong enough for cutting tasks but aren't prybars).A ZT is certainly not a CRK though. It's another level of knowing their stuff. I've seen mutiple fractures on a 0561 Myself .
Never saw a fracture in a CRK or Hinderer.
Regarding the hole. Looks great and I'd try one out. No more/less confidence inspiring imo. Things can happen either way. But a well done stud is stronger
I think you'll be fine, looks like a clean job that didn't get overly hot to compromise the heat treat.
Really like the new look of my Sebenza 25 with a spydie hole.
I always thought the CRK thumbstuds are too slippery and now I have a shiny new spydie hole to open the knife. And also less weight due to the metal removal
Why CRK don't offer this option? They can put a slightly oval hole if they fear the (stupid) Spyderco copyright.
The mod was made by cml_knifeworks.
Thanks to him.
