First off, thanks to everyone for their help. I believe that I found out what I needed to know from the State's website.
Shootist, I'm in NJ. The laws in TN seem to allow someone to carry either a fixed blade or folder, as long as someone says they are carrying it as a tool. That seems to be the same as here. I guess that holds true for just about ANY tool. If a person has a hammer in their hands, nobody's going to give them a hard time, unless they threaten or use it against someone. In that case, the hammer is considered a weapon.... right?
I think it ultimately comes down to the discretion of the Police Officer, at least initially. If you were to see someone walking down the street carrying a machete and there were no bushes to be trimmed, I don't think that the person would be allowed to go on their merry way, irregardless of the fact that they haven't stated their intent to use the machete as a weapon, or even a step further, as a defensive item.
What confuses me in my state is how a layperson, or anyone other than a lawyer for that matter, is supposed to interpret the law. For example,
Section 2C:39-3 states:
"......Any person who knowingly has in his possession any gravity knife, switchblade knife, dagger, dirk, stiletto, billy, blackjack, metal knuckle, sandclub, slingshot, cestus or similar leather band studded with metal filings or razor blades imbedded in wood, ballistic knife,
without any explainable lawful purpose, is guilty of a crime of the fourth
degree." (Emphasis mine)
This would mean to me, and I'd like to think I have a reasonable amount of intelligence, that as long as I have a reason that is lawful, all of the items mentioned would be legal to possess. I run EMS in my town, and a knife that opens with one hand would abviously be an asset. But I'd STILL be real uncomfortable in opening any type of auto in front of an officer, especially if it were someone I didn't know. That leaves me with either a fixed blade or a folder with some kind of one stud. The way that the law reads, to me, is that there's no limit as to the size of the blade, whether fixed or not. Does this mean someone can carry a sword?
Well, obviously I'm not a writer, and I hope that I'm conveying my thoughts, if not in a completely clear way. Just that I'm a little frustrated when it comes to adhering to the laws when they're so vague.
For example, in NJ, it's legal to BUY hollowpoint ammunition, but it's NOT legal to possess them. Yes, you read that correct.
That's why we're moving to Nevada.
Thanks for your time,
Dave