Whilst looking to buy a new 'bushcraft' type knife, I've become puzzled by the different steels used on both sides of the Atlantic:
In the UK, many knives use "01" steel, which doesn't seem to feature so much in the USA. Conversely, "A2" steel seems to be used in the USA, but not much in the UK. Examples of this would be the "Ray Mears" knives and the various similar knives that have resulted - most (if not all) of which use 01. Chris Reeve (one-piece) bush knives use A2.
According to some graphs I found on-line, both 01 and A2 have very similar 'toughness' & 'wear resistance' profiles. Some further research suggests that both hold an edge extremely well. From what I've read, the only real difference seems to be that 01 has more of a tendency to rust than A2.
If indeed 01 is prone to rust, it would seem to be an odd choice for a blade that, if used for it's intended purpose, would often be in water or other damp conditions (jungle etc.).
Perhaps someone could point out the virtues/limitations of these two steels.
In the UK, many knives use "01" steel, which doesn't seem to feature so much in the USA. Conversely, "A2" steel seems to be used in the USA, but not much in the UK. Examples of this would be the "Ray Mears" knives and the various similar knives that have resulted - most (if not all) of which use 01. Chris Reeve (one-piece) bush knives use A2.
According to some graphs I found on-line, both 01 and A2 have very similar 'toughness' & 'wear resistance' profiles. Some further research suggests that both hold an edge extremely well. From what I've read, the only real difference seems to be that 01 has more of a tendency to rust than A2.
If indeed 01 is prone to rust, it would seem to be an odd choice for a blade that, if used for it's intended purpose, would often be in water or other damp conditions (jungle etc.).
Perhaps someone could point out the virtues/limitations of these two steels.