- Joined
- Feb 25, 2001
- Messages
- 6,675
I just have to get this off of my chest. Ive been here on BladeForums for about five months now, and have watched a whole lot of threads about blade steel. People talk about how one steel performs so much better than another, and Im rather confused. Ive been purchasing a lot of Buck knives lately, which I believe all use 420HC. 420HC really seems to have a reputation around here as being a rather lackluster steel compared to others like ATS-34, 154CM, 440V, and even AUS8.
The problem is that I absolutely love the performance of these Bucks!!!! My father-in-law and I absolutely beat the snot out of my Buck Big Sky last weekend, and it just laughed in our faces. It came scary sharp, and left the woods scary sharp. We hacked down branches and small trees, shaved pounds of bark, cut up kindling, and cleaned fish. The Big Sky didnt even notice that we even used it. It just kept smiling, waiting to be taken from its sheath. The same goes for my Buck Cadet pocketknife. The Cadet has whittled god-only-knows how much cherry and birch.
So whats the problem with 420HC? Is it just particularly well suited to the outdoors and woodcutting, and the super-steels are more of an indoor use steel? While I have to admit that my BG-42 blades are beyond belief, I really havent been blown away by many of the other fancy steels. Is Bucks blade geometry that good that they dont need a better steel for excellent performance?
I guess Im totally confused. I actually prefer 420HC over most of the highly hyped steels. Am I missing something?
The problem is that I absolutely love the performance of these Bucks!!!! My father-in-law and I absolutely beat the snot out of my Buck Big Sky last weekend, and it just laughed in our faces. It came scary sharp, and left the woods scary sharp. We hacked down branches and small trees, shaved pounds of bark, cut up kindling, and cleaned fish. The Big Sky didnt even notice that we even used it. It just kept smiling, waiting to be taken from its sheath. The same goes for my Buck Cadet pocketknife. The Cadet has whittled god-only-knows how much cherry and birch.
So whats the problem with 420HC? Is it just particularly well suited to the outdoors and woodcutting, and the super-steels are more of an indoor use steel? While I have to admit that my BG-42 blades are beyond belief, I really havent been blown away by many of the other fancy steels. Is Bucks blade geometry that good that they dont need a better steel for excellent performance?
I guess Im totally confused. I actually prefer 420HC over most of the highly hyped steels. Am I missing something?