I find it interesting that the last 2 posts "claim" to never speak down on guided sharpening, but are ended with claims that their own freehand sharpening is now better than they could with a guided system. That is because they put more time and effort into freehand sharpening. Your best edges will typically come from the one you put the effort into. Although there are those who sometimes have a natural ability with one system over the other. And to the previous members, please do not be offended by what I said. That was not my purpose. Just pointing out how this is very often how we think. In my case, I learned freehand first. But I excelled when I moved to guided- To the point I have designed and built my own sharpener. I always appreciated being able to freehand sharpen though. Unfortunately I no longer have the option, as an accident in 2014 resulted in my left arm/hand being paralyzed. And though I have become very skilled at making custom knives, building tooling(like the sharpener), building firearms, reloading, etc., freehand sharpening with one hand is one thing out of my reach. But I am ok with that, as I would put my edges up against any. (I'm not saying mine are "better". Just that I would not feel over matched). I have a deep admiration for free hand sharpened edges. They are beautiful, and each one has its own character. Much like my custom made knives, no two are the same. Each freehand Edge is unique. And that is very cool. Guided sharpening, on the other hand, is meticulous, precise & hard lined. Repeatable, no matter the steel. Much easier to learn(for most). I don't concentrate so much, on freehand, vs guided sharpening so much. Rather, I look at the sharpening media being used. IMHO, water stones always win. Given the same sharpening media, I believe either method to be equally worthy. It's a matter of preference.