what happened to the issued sheath knife? My friend who is serving refers to his issue Kabar, but he's not a knife guy so i couldn get him to tell me what they carry he just called it a kabar... and they get abused
Valid comment - and you also pinned it down precisely. ONLY the Marines issue a knife to each soldier. The Army doesn't, period, except as a tool inventoried as part of a larger set.
It's a myth that soldiers at large get any knife "issued" at all, as only 1 in 10 is in a combat MOS. Quite honestly, I've seen more Gerber Multitools on helicopter crews, TL29's on Signal wiremen, and Benchmade AFO's in Commander's pockets.
None of them would have paid over a hundred bucks for a knife they might lose they said. I agree completely. In my experience most soldiers pick up what they can use from the PX - Cold Steel, Spyderco, Buck, etc. The very few who do use a Strider - or Sebenza - can accept the loss. And often enough, they were issued the Strider as an accountable item, expendable but durable. There aren't many knives issued with serial numbers in the service.
The interesting parallel is that if someone wants to imply most Strider sales are to individuals not employed by DOD - which would be silly to deny, then it also would show that most Sebenza owners are also purchasing something they have no real need for. After all, the question SnG vs. Sebbie seems to imply the potential buyer is looking more for a pat on the back than a serious examination of the tools.
No choil vs big choil. Straight simple handle design vs more purpose driven grip shape. Hollow ground thinner edge vs flat ground heavier edge. You couldn't find 2 better designs to compare because they are nothing alike.
The CRK has much thicker titanium slabs than the Strider. It has to, because thin titanium flexes more than G-10. If the zaan or Seb had thin titanium like the Strider, it would become useless. Thats one reason Strider uses the G-10. Both knives are very solid. The Strider weighs a lot less however.The argument that G-10 is flexible, soft, or weak is completely without merit, especially in the Strider design.
The ergos are so different. Each one is better suited to certain tasks than the other. Blade shape, grind and design, same thing, each one is better suited to certain tasks than the other.The Strider offers more options for opening and hand positions. Outright winner here.
How many times does this kind of analysis get ignored in the thread? BM vs. Spyderco, it's all about ergos, blade grinds, the shape of the clip. Read up any Vex vs. Tenacious thread - same materials and treatment - you get the impression people know what they are talking about.
Mention SnG vs. Sebenza, it gets ignored. I can tell you why, the argument is about ego, not the tool, and the clash starts as soon as self images feel threatened.
So, if you are a well-heeled suburbanite slicing braunshweiger with your Sebenza on the tailgate of your Escalade at your daugher's soccer tournament, and you see a grubbier dude Stridering open a can of peaches on the back of his jeep, count your frickin blessings. After all, he hired you, right?
