Did you consider pollishing (buffing) it to a smooth finish...and if so why not?
Believe it or not, the blade feels "smooth", but the patina causes it to have a coarser look. I have the skills and tools to put a mirror polish on a knife, but I chose not to for several reasons...
1. I use this knife HARD. A polished blade would readily show scratches and scuffs after even light use. It would need a lot of maintenance to keep the polish looking good.
2. 1095 steel is susceptible to corrosion when exposed to moisture. A polished blade looks good, but has very little protection from corrosion. A patina protects from this. I did it to my Izula, and have worn it around my neck and in my pocket and taken it kayaking and camping and a multitude of other things, and I haven't had to sand it or buff any corrosion out at all. I hardly even clean it!
3. I love the look of a patina on a user knife. It just screams "use me" in my opinion, and I love that look.
This might be a dumb question, but considering I'm a noob I'm gonna ask. What are the downfalls or risks to the blade that may occur from doing this?
By the way it looks great! The reason for my question is I'm considering doing this...
There are very few risks to doing this if it is done properly. I have heard reports of the chemical causing some "pitting", a form of corrosion, on the knife after the coating has been removed. I have not observed this myself, but with the chemical I use it only takes literally 10 minutes and the coating is toast.
You do also need to inspect the knife for "red rust" after you have forced the patina on your blade. And red rust would need to be sanded out. Red rust = BAD.
Honestly though, these are the same risks associated with improper maintenance of any knife. A patina looks cool, protects your knife, and can be change down the road.
If you don't like how it looks, you can always remove the patina and put a mirror polish on it if you'd like.
JGON