The links provided by Johnniet are very interesting. The analysis of Eric Harris is thought-provoking.
Part 1: Hatred was really disgust (inferiority).
I'm certainly not a professional at studying personalities, but I just can't help but wonder how many "normal" teens express similar sentiments. I just wonder if Fuselier arrived at his conclusion because of the kinds of expressions, included in the article, in isolation or because of the expressions in combination with the other analyses. If it is in isolation, which I suspect it is, then I just don't see it. It just seems to me that many teenagers write similar commentary in order to deflect their own insecurities not necessarily superiority.
Part 2: He lied for pleasure- I can appreciate the distinction that Fuselier made between lying to protect onesself versus lying for the thrill of deceit. I don't believe that I would have realized that subtle difference if I had read his ramblings on my own.
Part 3: Lack of remorse or empathy. Is it really unusual for a person in a diversionary program to lie to the extent that he or she expresses empathy in a letter to the victim? This analysis seems to be an offset of Part 2, ie, that he enjoyed deceiving people. He was good at it.
I'm really more impressed by the plotting and sheer size of their plan. I think that's more indicative of a psychopathic personality... I agree with their viewpoint that Columbine wasn't committed as a vendetta but as means to attain "infamy on a historical scale." The article was an interesting read. It's a shame that most people will remember this as a response to school bullying.
By the way, you guys are a bunch of scary psychopaths just waiting to explode...
