I know that most of us here are the type who prefer to select & procure the individual components to assemble our own kits rather than just buy a pre-assembled kit from a survival kit company. That said, we all usually have the same criteria in mind when choosing the right components, such as (in no particular order) weight, performance, reliability, ease of use, multiple uses (adaptability), cost, and size/volume/displacement.
Here's the question. How do each of you rank these criteria IN ORDER OF PRIORITY when selecting the components of your kit, with "1" being the top priority? (There may be other criteria that you have for your gear other than what I listed; if so, list it also). For example, for a pocket survival kit it might be:
AT-WORK/OFFICE POCKET KIT CRITERIA:
1. size
2. weight
3. multiple uses
4. reliability
5. etc.
If you have more than one size of kit, or if you're working in kits of various sizes & purposes, please make a separate list of criteria in order of priority for each kit and note the size and intended purpose of the kit at the top of each list. This should be interesting.
------------------
Molon Labe
[This message has been edited by X-Head (edited 05-25-2001).]
Here's the question. How do each of you rank these criteria IN ORDER OF PRIORITY when selecting the components of your kit, with "1" being the top priority? (There may be other criteria that you have for your gear other than what I listed; if so, list it also). For example, for a pocket survival kit it might be:
AT-WORK/OFFICE POCKET KIT CRITERIA:
1. size
2. weight
3. multiple uses
4. reliability
5. etc.
If you have more than one size of kit, or if you're working in kits of various sizes & purposes, please make a separate list of criteria in order of priority for each kit and note the size and intended purpose of the kit at the top of each list. This should be interesting.
------------------
Molon Labe
[This message has been edited by X-Head (edited 05-25-2001).]