Survival Rifle or Air Rifle

If you're grabbing a rifle to run off to the deep woods forever, and ever they by all means, yes...a .22 LR is the obvious answer.

Personally though, I'm not at all inclined to discount the air rifle. While it's clearly lacking the range and power of the .22 LR, it does have it's assets. It's been a long time since I've posted in any forums so bear with me and my poor writing, but...

An air rifle is compact. a person can pick up a decent RWS 34, Benji, etc. fill a shoe box full of pellets and have a life time supply of ammo. If you find a gun that shoots it, Crosman Premier pellets are still about $8.00 per 500 rounds. (hint- the RWS Diana 48,52,54,56 generally love them)

The limited range of the air rifle in the country can become your best friend in the suburbs. There could very well be opportunities for small game present, but you don't want to worry about launching a projectile into a neighborhood, road, or whatever 300 yards away.

How much power do you think you really need for small game? When I was a kid I killed enough small game with a Daisy 880 to keep the local soup kitchen going for a year. I've also killed more than enough in my adult life with different airguns. squirrel, rabbit, opossum, ptarmigan, etc. all killed with an airgun that usually had only 6-8 FPE, and rarely more than 14. When I can shoot rabbits, and watch them just drop instantly- not even a movement or a twitch, I have a hard time believing I need that much more power.

Though airguns aren't always whisper quiet, many PCP's are, with the addition of a shrouded bbl. or a LDC. Even though most springers still make a bit of noise, it's still more of a mechanical noise, that's not always instantly recnognized as gunfire, by people or animals, or especially animals that are weary of people.

Even here in the "Last Frontier" There's places that you can not hunt with a firearm, but you CAN hunt with a non-firearm aka Air Rifle or archery.

the term "survival" means different things to different folks. I most often consider events of ethnic cleansing, natural disaster, or a long term depression when I hear the term. I don't always think survival is to get cammied up and run off to the woods. I often consider it as prospect of getting by on very, very damn little for a long time. Once again, roving bands of looters, roaming thousands of miles of back country, etc. might not be the forte' of the airgun. hanging out at the cabin, house, truck, etc. to take shots of opportunity, or to stay in practice when ammo is hard to get...maybe a good thing.

And in the depression scenario...everybody I know talks about poaching deer, moose, etc. to feed the tribes. My curiosity is...how many deer, caribou, and moose are really out there, six months to a year after something bad goes down. I think alot of what will be left to shoot at is varmints, and small game of opportunity.

If nothing else in this world....once you learn to shoot a springer well, you can pretty much shoot anything. and it's damn convenient and affordable to stay in tune with a decent airgun, and accuracy is relevant no matter what you're shooting.
 
I think you have to ask yourself "why am I carrying a gun?".
If it is to kill things to eat, is an air rifle going to take down pigs, deer, sheep, goats, etc?
If it is to kill things before they hurt you, is it gong to take down dogs, bears, wolves, zombies, etc?

Considering the potential uses and requirements and then catering your equipment for that - sounds a bit crazy, but just may have some merit.

I think that if you are talking about taking deer from a longish range then even a .22 is a little weak, I'd prefer to have a .270 hunting rifle for that. But if you are talking about rabbits & squirrels at fairly close range then a good air rifle makes a lot of sense. For self defence a pistol is probably much better than a rifle.
 
Lots of different ideas and opinions. I haven't found the coconut to test with yet, but I intend to early next week, I'll post results and pictures.

I think the .177 does have a place in certain scenarios, and less of a place in others. Ultimately, it's all about options. I'm glad to be able to add this to my set-up and I think it will also be a good training tool for my girlfriend.
 
If we had to stay in the suburbs and bug in, I would use my Benjamin 177.cal air rifle to acquire food if need be. Very powerful and quiet. If we left out I would use one of my many 22cal. rifles. You just can't beat a 22 in most situations. A blowgun can be a deadly close range tool for killing small game in an urban environment as well.
 
. A blowgun can be a deadly close range tool for killing small game in an urban environment as well.

Not my experience, after the third animal ran off with one of my darts in it I decided it is a novelty and not very useful for actual hunting, YMMV. Chris
 
Not my experience, after the third animal ran off with one of my darts in it I decided it is a novelty and not very useful for actual hunting, YMMV. Chris

You were correct! ANY tool that doesn't work for you is not very useful! If you can kill an animal with a .22 but just can't get a kill with a bow then how useful is a bow? It doesn't really matter how successful someone else claims to be with a certain weapon - if it doesn't work for you then it is a waste of time.

This is one benefit of fishing/hunting/camping, you can try out different things that may be useful WTSHTF and see if they work - BEFORE you have to rely on those things for your life!
 
By ".22" you meen a .22 LR rimfire, not a .22 caliber air rifle?

Then you are very wrong. By an order of magnitude. An average decent quality .177 air rifle produces a muzzle energy between 10 and 15 foot pounds at the muzzle. A cheap pump up Daisy of Crosman would be much less.

A .22 CB cap produces about 30. A subsonic .22lr about 90. Past that point most air rifles can't even keep up with the velocity, never mind the kinetic energy.

A standard .22 long rifle high velocity load, like a CCI Minimag, is up at about 120 to 130 FPE. Hot loaded .22 lr rounds like the Velocitor are edging up toward 200 fpe.

Basically, the rimfire rounds are 3-4 times heavier and are going significantly faster. Energy increases with the square of velocity.

In very practical terms this meens that even the lowly .22 long rifle will blast right through things that will stop 90% of air rifle projectiles cold.

Well, I was going off of this.. http://www.pyramydair.com/site/articles/formulas/

If using a 10 grain pellet at 1,000 fps it's 22 ft lbs of energy. Even then though, that .22 CB has more energy velocity, so I might be wrong saying it's comparable to .22 entirely. I just think that it's probably capable of killing a large majority of smaller game that you would be able to with a .22, and then on top of that you'd probably be able to kill more because you'd scare less away with a smaller report, and you'd have more dispensable ammo.

Honestly I think I would rather have a .22 like a 10/22 to try to take down larger animals as well if I had to choose one or the other, but if you had both of them imagine how much of an attribute a light-weight air rifle with thousands of rounds of ammo can be in addition to the .22.
 
Well, I was going off of this.. http://www.pyramydair.com/site/articles/formulas/

If using a 10 grain pellet at 1,000 fps it's 22 ft lbs of energy. Even then though, that .22 CB has more energy velocity, so I might be wrong saying it's comparable to .22 entirely. I just think that it's probably capable of killing a large majority of smaller game that you would be able to with a .22, and then on top of that you'd probably be able to kill more because you'd scare less away with a smaller report, and you'd have more dispensable ammo.

Honestly I think I would rather have a .22 like a 10/22 to try to take down larger animals as well if I had to choose one or the other, but if you had both of them imagine how much of an attribute a light-weight air rifle with thousands of rounds of ammo can be in addition to the .22.


Thousands of rounds. At a fraction of the price! I'm digging it!
 
I have killed many animals w/ my scoped Beeman R9(.177) and it's not as high pwered as others. It is quite heavy though.

Squirrel, rabbit, crow, starling, duck.

You'd have some meat at least.
 
I myself opt for my old 1940's Remington model # 514 bolt action single shot chambered for, short, long and long rifle.. I typically carry about a box of shorts and a box of CCI Stinger ammo which weighs practically nothing. This rifle also is the lightest .22 I have ever owned bar none and the accuracy is unbeatable. It was built initially for the boys rifle market 60 some years ago and became quite popular all around because of its incredible accuracy..

2yl37dt.jpg


These rifles can still be purchased used fairly cheaply today. Just saw one go at my local pawn shop for $125.USD


Anthony
 
Last edited:
This will work for me. My Model 63 Winchester.

ScannedImage-3.jpg

Very sweet. Another USA made classic produced in the 1940's! Great shooter too. Very :cool: and that pup is worth a little scratch now as well. They are getting harder and harder to find anymore. :thumbup:


Anthony
 
Very sweet. Another USA made classic produced in the 1940's! Great shooter too. Very :cool: and that pup is worth a little scratch now as well. They are getting harder and harder to find anymore. :thumbup:


Anthony

If you like that you will love this. My Model Winchester 67 Bolt action.

model67.jpg
 
Oh my HD that is an incredible piece of Winchester rim-fire history there, pard. :thumbup: Built starting in the mid-late 1930's and discontinued after 1963 if memory serves. Do you know which year yours was built?

Anthony
 
Oh my HD that is an incredible piece of Winchester rim-fire history there, pard. :thumbup: Built starting in the mid-late 1930's and discontinued after 1963 if memory serves. Do you know which year yours was built?

Anthony

I believe 1945.

Thanks man.

My Grandfather taught me to shoot with this rifle when I was about 6.
 
I have a modified Bengamin that does 24 ft pounds in .22.
I have a takedown 10/22 that is smaller and lighter.

I figure the air rifle is good for urban hunting...just try to gather a mess of mice or sparrows for the pot with a .22. It feels like I could scramble the contents of the cranial vault of anything under 50 pounds or so.

The 22LR was originally designed as a deer rifle. With excellant marksmanship it can easily take big game. Ruins the meat of even a squirrel with a body shot.

Both are excellent food gathering tools, but are not interchangeable. If you find yourself at the gun cabinet, unable to make a decision...consider that you absolutely cannot effectively fight with an airgun.
 
I have a .177 Daisy that is one piece of the weaponry stable as I believe everything that can be used for hunting should be available should they be needed. Will it replace my other weapons? In a word, "no." But it won't be forgotten either. $50 worth of ammo for the .177 goes a LONG way in stockpiling BB's and good quality Pellets.

I've used this .177 air rifle to kill game up to porcupine/raccoon size with proper ammo and shot placement. At very close range, it is no slouch. I would use it for birds, squirrels and rabbits without reservations within it's limits.

Would I grab it before a .22, 12ga, bow? No. But if I ended up resorting to the .177, I wouldn't hesitate in using it.

I've been looking at .22 air rifles as well, and see benefits to that system too, but since I already have .177, I'll stick with it and not invest in another airgun system in the near future.
 
It isn't for everyone. It CAN be a useful tool if used properly.

I am pretty sure I used it properly, you stick a dart in it and then blow into the end.

If you have experience taking game with a blow gun I would love to hear the proper way to do it, as I said, it did not work out too well for me. I am also sad to admit that I have shot several animals with field tipped arrows, which I will never do again, they also proved to be very poor killers. With that experience it is really hard to believe that without poison those little bitty round darts are going to be very efficient, properly used or not. Chris
 
Back
Top